EMI in auto destruct mode
  • uhh. I thought EMI wouldn't start pushing up daisies before WMG.  But they are taking step to ensure they are ahead.



    heh heh. they still haven't figured out what's wrong with them.





    ---



    EMI Recorded Music still has value to the vast majority of artists - in funding their development and in distributing and marketing their music - but highly successful bands have other alternatives for making money (such as touring) and a few, especially the more established ones, may be able to abandon their label and try to go it alone.  You can see why they might choose to do so.  Why should they subsidise their label’s new talent roster - or for that matter their record company’s excessive expenditures and advances - particularly when they are providing income to their record company through their catalogue sales?



    http://hypebot.typepad.com/hypebot/2007/10/full-text-of-le.html#more
  • Universal, Sony BMG and Warner Music Launching iTunes Killer




    Three of the biggest names in entertainment are planning an online music service so massive it will post the most serious threat yeat to Apple’s iTunes Store. Universal, Warner Music and Sony BMG aren’t only going to beat iTunes with size, they also have a unique business model in mind. Subscription to the music service would require customers to sign up from a manufacturer of their choice, whether you’ve bought a SanDisk, Creative, Archos branded PMP and pay a monthly - right now this is estimatd to be as little as $5 with unlimited downloads. Universal has already rejected a deal with Apple to sell music via iTunes. The srvice is set to be available towards the end of 2008. Compared with another iTunes rival care of Nokia, the Universal, Sony, Warner partnership warrant a more serious consideration from Apple.





    ------------



    This is going to be hilarious. It'll be another Zune style thud. But It should make apple thinks. Plus, end of 2008?  Hmm, ...
  • moving at their usual speed
  • I love how everything new is instantly branded an iTunes/iPod killer. Why the obsession with that term?
  • This is getting funnier and funnier.



    1. the savviest buyers already have iPod

    2. with music taste that is increasingly outside the majors



    So who exactly are these people going to target with their "lock in" player?

    really, how successful was napster?



    The only good coming out of this: it force Apple to stop effing around with iphone as cellphone+mp3 player and actually turn it into PDA.





    http://idolator.com/tunes/extending-the-drm-brand/will-universal-manage-to-make-a-music-player-more-useless-than-the-zune-311014.php



    When an unanswered question about your new line of music players is whether you can use it to play MP3's, it might be time to go back to the drawing board, but Morris and his blind rage towards Jobs and his music marketplace must prevail! Irving Azoff says so!
    While the details are in flux, insiders say Morris & Co. have an intriguing business model: get hardware makers or cell carriers to absorb the cost of a roughly $5-per-month subscription fee so consumers get a device with all-you-can-eat music that's essentially free. Music companies would collect the subscription fee, while hardware makers theoretically would move many more players. "Doug is doing the right thing taking on Steve Jobs," says ex-MCA Records Chairman Irving Azoff, whose Azoff Music Management Group represents the Eagles, Journey, Christina Aguilera, and others. "The artists are behind him."

    Morris and Jobs were once the best of allies. When Jobs began pushing his idea for a simple-to-use download store in 2003, Morris backed him. Industry insiders say Jobs felt that Morris, unlike many other music executives, understood that they had to adapt or die. And in the years that followed, Apple and Universal moved in near lockstep.

    But before long, Morris realized he and his fellow music executives had ceded too much control to Jobs. "We got rolled like a bunch of puppies," he said during a recent meeting, according to people who were there. And though Morris hasn't publicly blasted Jobs, his boss at Universal parent Vivendi is not nearly so hesitant. The split with record labels--Apple takes 29 cents of the 99 cents--"is indecent," Vivendi CEO Jean-Bernard Levy told reporters in September. "Our contracts give too good a share to Apple."...

    With the Total Music service, Morris and his allies are trying to hit reset on how digital music is consumed. In essence, Morris & Co. are telling consumers that music is a utility to which they are entitled, like water or gas. Buy one of the Total Music devices, and you've got it all. Ironically, the plan takes Jobs' basic strategy-- getting people to pay a few hundred bucks for a music player but a measly 99 cents for the music that gives it value--and pushes it to its extreme. After all, the Total Music subscriber pays only for the device--and never shells out a penny for the music. "You know that it's there, and it costs something," says one tech company executive who has seen Morris' presentation. "But you never write a check for it."
  • btw,



    what these idiot at music company doesn't understand... and will soon realize about not effing with computer company...



    Apple can simply release hacks that suck all songs and release it for free on the net. Anonymously. The record company does not control the key piece : desktop computer. Digital music player doesn't work without a desktop.



    This not to mention all delicious class action/market monopoly lawsuit the majors are going to get. haa haa..
  • when i get bored i read thrugh all of of squashed's threads and i feel enlightened.  perhaps falsely or whatever, but i feel like i know things for a few hours.
  • squashed is a lunatic.



    But his threads are interesting and I like reading them, and this squalid little corner of the internets would not be same without him.  So we jest, but we need our Daily Squashed.
  • come on... It's not that hard to predict their behavior. It's just a mix of dumb, mean and greedy.  You can practically shape their behavior to your advantage by now.
  • Well I would agree with you on that one entirely.  I have done some consulting work for huge companies before, and their decision making process is so woefully bad it's just embarrassing.  It's all based around colossal meetings, desperately trying to please the boss, irrespective of what nonsense this requires you to spout, and this sort of lumpen inability to innovate.  So yes, dumb, mean and greedy just about sums it up.



    I said a while back that it was like watching the playground bully with a migraine - he just flails around desperately trying to hit someone with no real idea why he's so angry.
  • As a budding instructional technologist, I have to say that these people are dumb.
  • In addition to possibly selling off its distribution business, British equity group Terra Firma may try and cut the budget of recent acquisition EMI by slashing the employment rolls at its recorded music and publishing divisions.



    http://idolator.com/tunes/layoffs/-317152.php



    start to look like chop shop to me. without distribution what exactly is EMI? Tape storage buildings and management? lol.
  • EMI's New Owner: What Did I Just Buy?






    The FT takes a swipe at Terra Firma, the private equity shop which paid $4.7 billion for EMI this summer: The paper says Terra Firma's Guy Hands is now "in a wild panic about his impulsive acquisition and how he’ll manage to make a return on the record company he bought on the back of 43 pages of basic due diligence."



    This is the second time we've seen this story in the last 30 days; the New York Post told a similar tale in late October. Two possible conclusions: Either Hands really did make an enormous and capricious blunder, or there are a lot of people who wish Hands ill and are using the press to do their bidding. Alternate conclusion: Both of the previous statements are true.



    Meanwhile, similarly sized Warner Music Group (WMG) now trades below $7 a share, down from $26.80 a year ago. Investors value the company at a mere $1.05 billion.
  • EMI going to split from teh cartel? whaaa?

    Is this even possible?









    http://www.p2pnet.net/story/14152



    EMI, “wants to cut its funding to the industry’s trade bodies, a source familiar with the situation told Reuters on Wednesday, which could deal a blow to the fight against music piracy,” says Reuters.


    “The source said EMI … was looking at ways to ’substantially’ reduce the amount it pays trade groups,” says the story, going on:



    The groups, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and other national associations, represent music companies and the fight against illegal piracy.


    They receive funding from the four major music groups - EMI, Warner, Sony BMG and Universal - and hundreds of small independent labels.


  • this could be interesting. I wonder if EMI will be the first company that truly gets what digital era record company is about.



    Tho' they still have to get rid even more people . The entire company probably should be less than  300 people. 



    I wonder if it is possible to run WMG with 50 people.



    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080113/bs_nm/emi_dc_1



    Music company EMI, home to Robbie Williams and Coldplay, will cut up to 2,000 jobs as part of a restructuring being planned by its private equity boss Guy Hands, Sunday newspapers reported.



    Hands plans to cut the marketing budget to 12 percent of projected sales, from 20 percent, but raise spending on A&R (artist and repertoire), which looks for new talent, The Sunday Telegraph said.


    The Sunday Times said EMI would also ditch thousands of artists when he announces his plans on Tuesday.

  • Looks like Guy dispensed with the "fruit and flowers" fund pretty quickly ;-)
  • He's approaching it as an investment, which is smart from a financial perspective. I'm sure he's making people nervous by admitting it's all about the almighty dollar (or pound, or euro) but at least he's being honest about it. At any rate, he seems to be in a better position to actually put changes in effect than say, Rick Rubin. I don't know if they'll be of great benefit to the artists, of course. He's probably going to save money by losing Robbie Williams alone (didn't they give him some outrageous chunk of change, like $80 million?)


    FT:


    Guy Hands is close to raising £200m ($391m) of fresh equity to inject into EMI as he prepares to slash more than a third of the staff in its problem-hit recorded music business.


    In his first interview since completing the £3.2bn acquisition, Mr Hands dismissed fears that Terra Firma, his private equity group, could lose money on the deal, struck just before the credit squeeze began.


    He accused the music industry of “burying the creative process in bureaucracy” and losing sight of its real function. “Our job is to monetise music for the artist,” he said. Instead, EMI’s network of labels had 19 managers, marketing executives and lawyers for every “A&R” talent scout.


    Mr Hands rejected accusations from artists and their managers that he did not understand creative businesses, saying the challenges at EMI were no different from those he had faced in pub, train and aircraft leasing businesses. He declined to say if he would inject more capital but is thought to be close to sealing the largest co-investment round Terra Firma has raised, allowing it to hit earnings targets agreed with bankers and fund A&R investment.

  • I worked at Capitol for 4 years. I was there when they laid off 2/3 of the capitol staff and now the few people left are likely to get pink slips. I thank my lucky stars im not there anymore. The sad part is in these mergers and restructurings its the assistants, coordinators, and managers who get the ax first. Then the new management steps in and they think they can pile more work on an already overloaded staff or hire tons of interns to pick up the slack.



    so so sooo happy to be free of EMI. If you want to know what its really like inside just email me. jax@rockinsider.com



    http://www.rockinsider.com/2008/01/emi-to-cut-2000-jobs-in-restructuring.html
  • I really can't see how those giant labels are sustainable at all. They are utterly unprepared to changing medium and doing the opposite things that they should have done. Instead of embracing and dictating the digital realm, they are fighting the inevitable. Of course they got chewed...



    I just hope most indie labels survives in this recession tho' .. it's about to crash big time.
  • Boggles my mind. ... $2.4B debt?



    http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/4/ft_citi_stuck_with_emi_debt_not_happy_about_it



    Here's a recipe for heartburn: Take one heap of music business malaise, add an equally large helping of credit crunch. Stir.

    How's that taste, Citigroup? Thought so. Citi, which financed Terra Firma's buyout of EMI last year, has been trying to lay off some of its $10 billion in EMI loans, but is having a hard time. No one, it seems, wants to back a struggling company in a struggling industry, particularly when the company seems unclear about where all of its money is going. FT:


    The bank had tried to include those loans in a $12bn portfolio that it is planning to sell at a discount to private equity firms. However, Citigroup was forced to remove them from the package after it was unable to provide adequate financial information to potential buyers, people familiar with the matter say.


    EMI is now in the midst of a radical restructuring being undertaken by Guy Hands, Terra Firma’s chief executive, that will include as many as 2,000 job cuts. Its bankers remain unclear about its future business prospects and the financial results of that overhaul, a person close to the situation said.



    There is also uncertainty because EMI is reviewing the way that it accounted for merchandise shipments to retailers in late 2007, according to people familiar with the matter.


    The FT story, which is both detail-laden and depressing, says EMI is specifically struggling to offload about $2.4 billion in debt, but feels OK about its chances with another $2.6 billion or so, since it's supposed be replaced with a music rights securitization deal.

  • this might actually be a smart move. (I wonder how much EMI gets from Universal.)



    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/global/article4397761.ece

    Rolling Stones to leave EMI for Universal




    Sir Mick Jagger is to lead The Rolling Stones away from Guy Hands’ EMI, ending a long association with the British record company.


    The band is expected to sign up with Universal Music, and the deal is all the more valuable because the Stones will control all their releases since the 1970s, including Sticky Fingers, Exile on Main Street and Black and Blue.


    Sir Mick’s decision — on the eve of his 65th birthday — follows a bidding war between all the big record labels, and is a blow to Mr Hands who failed personally to persuade him to stay.


    Mr Hands acquired EMI last year for £2.1 billion through Terra Firma, the UK private equity house.

  • Yeah, EMI is done it seems. GH didn't seem to implement any more stupendous and amazing plans than any of his predecessors.
  • Wow...The STONES will control all their releases or Universal will? I can't imagine how much EMI wanted to pry the masters for that shit out of their cold lifeless hands.
  • Wouldn't getting rid of the Stones be a good thing for a label? They really don't sell that many Cds these days. Oh, and don't tell anyone, but they're kind of old.
  • That last turd they plopped out still sold 2.5 million, so it probably still hurts EMI to lose them.
  • yeah, but I bet they ask for gazillion trillion $$$$$ advance for their last few albums.



    ...and they are kinda...ooooold. geriatric  kinda old, not mature kinda old.
  • My opinion on the Stones is pretty much in line with Jarvis Cocker - everything they've done since the 80's is like a bad cover version. Still, there's clearly a huge market of aging Baby Boomers who will snatch up anything the band excretes into the market.
  • Ehrrr...yeah.

    say goodbye to EMI.





    Revealed: EMI Lost $1.2 Billion In 2007

    10/27/2008 By Brock Thiessen



    If things didn’t look bleak for EMI before, they sure do now. According to recently released figures, the major label home of artists such as Coldplay and Lily Allen suffered a $1.2-billion loss in this financial year, which marks a far bigger decline than last year’s drop of $455 million.



    The root of the problem, the report says, is a “poor” operational system, with EMI focusing on an extremely high spending model (such as dishing out high executive salaries), overly traditional artist-label relationships and poor reporting of data in regards to artist profits.



    Despite EMI’s big-name roster and thriving publishing business, this system has caused the label to rank dead last among its major label peers, with a decline of physical CD sales at EMI falling 45 percent from 2005 to 2007, even though, as the Los Angeles Times points out, the average market decline was 19 percent. Also, EMI’s digital music sales are lagging compared to the other majors, the report says.



    “EMI Music had a history of signing great artists but had not adapted sufficiently to the changing consumer market for music,” the report states. “[T]here should be no false expectations. EMI cannot be turned around overnight.”



    EMI spokesman Neil Bennett told the Los Angeles Times that since the end of financial year, the label has moved forward. "An awful lot has happened since then," he says. "EMI is a company going through radical change."




    http://www.exclaim.ca/articles/generalarticlesynopsfullart.aspx?csid1=126&csid2=844&fid1=34536
  • *chuckle* 



    http://www.forbes.com/2009/07/13/emi-citigroup-terra-markets-equity-music.html

    Discord At EMI






    "They are playing a game of chicken," said Claudio Aspesi, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein. "The reality is that nobody has a great interest in finding the true value of the assets."



    Neither company was willing to comment, but sources familiar with the situation said Terra Firma wanted Citigroup to inject up to 300 million pounds ($486.2 million) into EMI and write off about 500 million pounds' ($810.3 million) worth of debt owed by the label's recorded music subsidiary. Citi was unlikely to accept, said the sources, because it would mean writing off a hefty chunk of EMI's 2.5 billion-pound ($4.1 billion) debt pile just for the privilege of staying on as lender.


    This does not mean Citi is in any hurry to force EMI into bankruptcy, however. That would mean facing the ugly truth of a realistically-valued EMI in fire-sale mode, which might then squash the bank's dreams of getting its money back. Already Terra Firma has written off half of its own 2.6 billion-euro ($3.6 billion) investment in EMI, two years after the acquisition was agreed.

  • As Squashed put it

    "Ehrrr...yeah.
    say goodbye to EMI. "

    Guy Hands himself said goodbye to EMI not too long ago. I think Chris Martin is due for a promotion..
  • my guess would be basic looting. Since morale plunges, everybody tried to save their ass by charging it to the company account before the party is over.
  • Labels have got to start thinking forward not to catch up.

    Google for instance is innovative, apple too, why not supersede and there for succeed?

    Sony Australia has finally branched off and re-branded after a few years of negative profit.

    Silly stuff
  • LONDON (Reuters) - British private equity group Terra Firma <TERA.UL> wants to bring in outside investors to help prop up music company EMI <LNDONE.UL>, which is struggling with 2.6 billion pounds of debt, The Observer reported.


    The report said pension funds, insurance companies and foreign banks had been approached by Terra Firma amid fears EMI could default on interest repayments to Citigroup Inc <C.N>, which bankrolled the buyout of the music group in 2007.


    Terra Firma on Friday accused Citigroup of fraud and sued the bank for billions in damages in connection with Terra Firma's purchase of EMI, court documents filed in New York showed.


    Terra Firma accuses Citigroup of inflating the price it paid for EMI by failing to reveal that the only other bidder, Cerberus Capital Management, had withdrawn hours before an auction for EMI closed.


     


    http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2009/12/13/business/business-uk-terra-firma-emi.html?_r=1


     


    omg man, give it up already.

  • pdate: A source familiar with the discussions told me that Universal initially approached EMI for a deal. Sony then heard about it and got in on the discussions as well as they turned serious over the weekend.

    In the wee hours of the morning yesterday, EMI walked out from the deal UMG was proposing as it did not offer enough value to stakeholders or its artists. The deal's off and EMI is finalizing a plan for its owner, Terra Firma, and in turn, Terra Firma is talking to its investors about additional funding for an "equity cure" or cash to ensure Terra Firma can meet its debt obligations for EMI.


    If EMI had been that desperate for cash, they would have taken the UMG deal — about $310 million — and banked the money before the end of its fiscal and you would have seen a deal announced. But EMI is doing great in an otherwise down market and they didn't need that UMG deal.



    In any case, the deadline for EMI is June. We'll see what happens. [AP via Brooklyn Vegan]


     


    http://gizmodo.com/5507321/emi-is-on-the-brink-of-death


     


    Hey, maybe we all should chip in $5bucks to buy BlueNotes. lol ...


    Anything else of value they still have?

  • Just die already you miserable sod.... I am preparing a party mix for the occasion already.



    http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2010/04/the-clock-is-ticking-for-emi.html



    Label Group Has Just 90 Days To Find A Miracle


    return false" href="http://www.hypebot.com/.a/6a00d83451b36c69e2012876c65b2b970c-popup">imagesanctumla.com" style="width: 100px; margin: 0pt 5px 5px 0pt;" src="http://www.hypebot.com/.a/6a00d83451b36c69e2012876c65b2b970c-100wi" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d83451b36c69e2012876c65b2b970c " alt="image from sanctumla.com" /> A 90 day clock began ticking for EMI late yesterday when talks to license catalog to Universal or Sony ended, according to sources. Price was reportedly the primary reason that discussions ended, but a concerned creditor who is owed $2.5 billion and at least one pending lawsuit certainly didn't help.


    Failure to make the deal, means that EMI will fail its solvency test and miss a major loan payment to Citi. EMI and owner Terra Firma now have 90 days to find an injection of cash as well as to develop a viable plan to move forward. 


    Inside EMI, staffers are bitter that their efforts to improve the company's position will have little effect on the outcome. "We're being punished for past excesses in both the record and the financial industries," an EMI veteran told Hypebot.

  • Beatlemania on iTunes set to buoy EMI profits




    Warner Music Group 4Q loss widens


    Record company Warner Music Group Corp. said Wednesday that its fiscal 2010 fourth-quarter loss widened on lower revenue, reflecting the continued shift from CD sales to digital music.


    The company lost $46 million, or 31 cents per share, compared with a loss of $18 million, or 12 cents per share, during the same period a year prior. Revenue fell 13 percent to $752 million from $867 million. The fourth quarter ended Sept. 30.


    Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected a loss of 13 cents per share on $731.7 million in revenue.


    "The company's revenue results continue to reflect the transition from physical to digital in the recorded music industry where increases in digital revenue have not yet fully offset the declines in physical revenue," the company said in a statement.


    Revenue from recorded music fell 13.3 percent to $619.9 million during the quarter, with the U.S., Japan, and most of Europe the weakest markets. But digital revenue from the sector rose 7 percent to $183 million.


    http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9JI09D80.htm



    ----
  • The Beatles fail to invade UK charts


    No big hits after iTunes deal


    All the speculation that The Beatles' arrival on the iTunes Music Store might lead to the band's most famous songs re-appearing in the upper echelons of the UK singles chart appears to have been misplaced. In fact, only one song, Hey Jude, reached the top 40 on Sunday - at number 40.



    http://www.musicradar.com/news/guitars/the-beatles-fail-to-invade-uk-charts-308629

  • People bored of 10,000 Beatles releases in a million different formats shocker (as they ripped their copy of Blue and Red into iTunes years ago).

    EMI are doomed.
  • They've been doomed along time ago, they are like so in debt its not funny lol
  • Yeah, it definitely proves, even more, that EMI is bloated with old school bureaucratic management who are clueless on how to address the digital era.



    As loftandlost noted, the Beatles catalogue is everywhere digitally already. It's crazy that EMI would think they would make money off this deal to pull them out of the hole.

  • Indie Exec To Take Over Warner/Chappell

    "Warner Music Group has named indie music industry entrepreneur Cameron Strang as chief executive of its Santa Monica music publishing firm Warner/Chappell Music.


    Maybe a move in the right direction for Warner?

  • oh yeah. blame pirate instead of mismanagement.  Wait until anonymous get a hand on these guys. Their book is pure fraud.

    Music Exec: “Pirates Murdered EMI”

    http://torrentfreak.com/music-exec-pirates-murdered-emi-110210/
  • The four major labels have a far more profound problem which is that they can no longer sustain their business model.

    Last year, around this time, writer Paul Rogers' published an article in the LA Weekly that discussed the demise of the major label A&R profession.


    Here we are a year later, continuing to witness the decimation, if
    not outright elimination, of the major label model. It's now apparent
    that, in the face of new economic realities, the model that flourished
    for years cannot be sustained in its current form. Universal Music Group
    has already announced cuts for 2011 of over $138-million in a massive
    restructuring plan even after several rounds of layoffs.

    http://www.hypebot.com/hypebot/2011/03/the-elimination-of-the-major-label-model.html

  • Bank of America Record here we come... ahahaha...

    I still can't get over the citibank record part.

    I wonder if banksters have better music taste? if so, they might have some redeeming value after all.
  • hey...WMG is for sale too! (Goldman is the broker)

    sooner or later the two become so worthless, Apple will buy them all for pennies. (Apple Record! woo)
    Don't do it Google. I know what you are thinking. It's a bad idea. Think RCA, CBS, etc. their time has passed.

    http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2011/03/warner-music-bids-from-ron-burkle-sony-platinum-equity.html

    The bidding for Warner Music Group is heating up, and a decision
    about the future of the New York company could come as early as the end
    of the month or early April, according to a source familiar with the
    bidding process being conducted by Goldman Sachs.


    Warner's board of directors has weeded down an initial list of about a
    dozen bids in the second round of the process, the source said. Among
    those in still in the running are industrialist Len Blavatnik,
    supermarket magnate Ron Burkle, Sony Music Entertainment, Kohlberg
    Kravis Roberts & Co. and Platinum Equity.


    Several bidders may also be interested in snagging EMI Group, which
    was recently taken over by Citigroup. The bank is widely expected to
    formally put EMI up for sale in the coming months. Combining with
    EMI could present some regulatory challenges because they represent the
    third- and fourth-largest music companies in the U.S., according to
    SoundScan.


  • Billionaire Edgar
    Bronfman Jr is stepping down as chief executive of Warner Music Group
    Corp, the world's third-largest music company, just two months after the
    company was bought by Len Blavatnik's Access Industries.

    Stephen Cooper, a long-time
    Blavatnik executive, will now run the company on a day-to-day basis
    while Bronfman takes on the role of chairman.As
    chairman, Bronfman is now expected to focus his attention primarily on
    the acquisition of London-based EMI Group. Cooper is a turnaround
    specialist with companies like MGM Studios but has limited experience in
    the music business.EMI was put up
    for sale by owner Citigroup earlier this year and Bronfman's team is
    widely seen as a leading contender for the home of the Beatles, Coldplay
    and Katy Perry. Other bidders for EMI's assets include Universal Music
    and Sony Music Entertainment.http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/19/industry-us-warnermusic-idUSTRE77I5ZO20110819So they gonna put EMI and WMG together? (incidentally, why is this all being permitted? isn't this monopoly?)
  • Universal buying EMI Music for $1.9 billion, says WSJ

    The Big 4 record companies just shrunk to the Big 3 according to the Wall Street Journal's sources. Citigroup is said to have agreed to sell EMI Music to Universal for $1.9 billion while Sony
    is picking up EMI Music Publishing for $2.2 billion. All that's left
    now is for the three companies to make it official sometime later today
    or over the weekend.

    http://www.theverge.com/2011/11/11/2553947/universal-buying-emi-music-for-1-9-billion-says-wsj

    And then there is only 3 left.  Hurry up WMG, join Universal already.

    so we have 2 dinos left really.  Universal, a truly gigantic monopoly. Or Sony. They don't care about music anymore. They are selling insurance these days.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!