WikiLeaks cables: Saudis proposed Arab force to invade Lebanon
Foreign minister wanted US, Nato and UN backing for offensive to end Iranian-backed Hezbollah's siege of government
I am Julian Assange.
I want information so that I can hold my government accountable. If my country acts improperly and in my name, I want the proof. I want to know if there actually is no evidence proving weapons of mass destruction. I want to know if America is working with Israel to overthrow Iran's leadership. I want data that has not been spun by reporters that work for publishers and broadcasters with political and business goals that conflict with the facts. I want to know.
I believe that governments are out of control and citizens have a decreasing belief that they can influence decisions. WikiLeaks and the Internet are empowering individuals and groups with information. Julian Assange and Bradley Manning are the first two faces and voices in a crowd that will soon be too big to control. Their arrests and charges and even prosecution will only spawn a broader resistance against war and deception and corruption. The Internet is now the reporter. This is the way the world is. I do not want to hear that there will always be wars and spying and death. I want information to prevent them and to build peace.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-moore/i-am-julian-assange_b_793583.html
Report: Wikileaks cables show Texas company "helped pimp little boys to stoned Afghan cops"
In the Houston Press, an extensive blog post untangling an alarming story from the state department cables: "another horrific taxpayer-funded sex scandal for DynCorp, the private security contractor tasked with training the Afghan police," and apparent proof that the company procured male children for bacha bazi ("boy-play") parties.
The story boils down to this: this company, headquartered in DC with Texas offices, helped pimp out little boys as sex slaves to stoned cops in Afghanistan:
For Pashtuns in the South of Afghanistan, there is no shame in having a little boy lover; on the contrary, it is a matter of pride. Those who can afford the most attractive boy are the players in their world, the OG's of places like Kandahar and Khost. On the Frontline video, ridiculously macho warrior guys brag about their young boyfriends utterly without shame.
So perhaps in the evil world of Realpolitik, in which there is apparently no moral compass US private contractors won't smash to smithereens, it made sense for DynCorp to drug up some Pashtun police recruits and turn them loose on a bunch of little boys. But according to the leaked document, Atmar, the Afghani interior minister, was terrified this story would catch a reporter's ear.
He urged the US State Department to shut down a reporter he heard was snooping around, and was horrified that a rumored videotape of the party might surface. He predicted that any story about the party would "endanger lives." He said that his government had arrested two Afghan police and nine Afghan civilians on charges of "purchasing a service from a child" in connection with the party, but that he was worried about the image of their "foreign mentors," by which he apparently meant DynCorp. American diplomats told him to chill. They apparently had a better handle on our media than Atmar, because when a report of the party finally did emerge, it was neutered to the point of near-falsehood.
9.40am: We are hanging on every word of Mark Stephens at the moment. This is what he told PA on his way to work:
![]()
I haven't even seen the warrant yet. We have got 10 days to do this and a lot of complex schedules to organise.
I am sure it will be announced when it happens. I have not yet spoken to the police.
Stephens declined to say where Assange is and where he expected to be arrested and interviewed.
-----------------------
9.55am: The cyber war over WikiLeaks appears to be escalating, with supporters of the site reportedly taking revenge against the Swiss bank that froze Assange's assets.
Operation Payback is now threatening to go after PayPal after claiming credit for shutting down the website of the Swiss bank PostFinance, Raw Story claims.
The site of the bank is currently unavailable.
On its Twitter account the group said: "PAYPAL.COM IS DOWN! AND YES WE ARE FIRING NOW!!! KEEP FIRING!"
Dear Interpol:
As a longtime feminist activist, I have been overjoyed to discover your new commitment to engaging in global manhunts to arrest and prosecute men who behave like narcissistic jerks to women they are dating.
I see that Julian Assange is accused of having consensual sex with two women, in one case using a condom that broke. I understand, from the alleged victims' complaints to the media, that Assange is also accused of texting and tweeting in the taxi on the way to one of the women's apartments while on a date, and, disgustingly enough, 'reading stories about himself online' in the cab.
Both alleged victims are also upset that he began dating a second woman while still being in a relationship with the first. (Of course, as a feminist, I am also pleased that the alleged victims are using feminist-inspired rhetoric and law to assuage what appears to be personal injured feelings. That's what our brave suffragette foremothers intended!).
Thank you again, Interpol. I know you will now prioritize the global manhunt for 1.3 million guys I have heard similar complaints about personally in the US alone -- there is an entire fraternity at the University of Texas you need to arrest immediately. I also have firsthand information that John Smith in Providence, Rhode Island, went to a stag party -- with strippers! -- that his girlfriend wanted him to skip, and that Mark Levinson in Corvallis, Oregon, did not notice that his girlfriend got a really cute new haircut -- even though it was THREE INCHES SHORTER.
Terrorists. Go get 'em, Interpol!
Yours gratefully,
Naomi Wolf
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/naomi-wolf/interpol-the-worlds-datin_b_793033.html?ref=tw
Suddenly we’re at a pivotal moment. Wikileaks is exposing the corruption among the global power elites on a level never seen before. They realize that this is an existential threat to them and are starting to apply the full weight of the CIA, Espionage Act, etc., to nip this thing in the bud. Don’t let them get away with it! An opportunity like this comes once in a lifetime. So let’s seize it! Let’s all become whistle blowers, let’s all start talking truth to power and, over the next few months, change forever the way the world does business.
http://www.adbusters.org/blogs/adbusters-blog/wikileaks.html
We are at war, and I don't mean the literal kind. It's the first all-out cyber war, not between nations but between factions: those who agree with what WikiLeaks is trying to do, and those who oppose them.
Nearly everybody is picking sides. Amazon's hosting service ditched WikiLeaks after a day, presumably as a result of pressure from Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman. EveryDNS did the same, citing its inability to cope with DDoS attacks launched by "hacktivists" opposed to the leaks. PayPal, Visa, and MasterCard have refused to handle payments for donations to WikiLeaks -- at least in part due to pressure from the U.S. State Department.
[ Check out a few samples of Cringely's long history covering WikiLeaks: WikiLeaks: A terrorist's best friend?. | WikiLeaks launches Web War III | Spies, WikiLeaks, and hackers, oh my! | For a humorous take on the tech industry's shenanigans, subscribe to Robert X. Cringely's Notes from the Underground newsletter. ]
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/120810-the-web-will-eat-itself.html
I realize there are other events taking place in Tech Land these days. Google, for example, seems determined to roll out a new operating system every damned day -- Gingerbread, Honeycomb, Chrome, and so on. But I can't stop thinking about WikiLeaks.
Why? Because this is the single most important story to hit the Internet ever. It dwarfs the Drudge Report's Monica Lewinsky scoop, the Twitter anti-Tehran uprising, and even the Pam Anderson sex video. Never before has a small band of whatever-you-want-to-call-thems taken on every major nation simultaneously, twisting them into knots. But thanks to the distributed nature of the Net, they have -- and I suspect they won't be the last.
Also: Journalism as we knew it is over. No more trade-offs between revealing some things while keeping other information private, of choosing between the necessary secrets governments must keep and the public's right to know -- it's now a free-for-all.
New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) [google.com]
The unanimous opinion itself is very short; essentially, designating documents as secret and punishing anyone who publishes them is a 'prior restraint' and presumed unconstitutional.
We granted certiorari in these cases in which the United States seeks to enjoin the New York Times and the Washington Post from publishing the contents of a classified study entitled "History of U. S. Decision-Making Process on Viet Nam Policy." Post, pp. 942, 943.
"Any system of prior restraints of expression comes to this Court bearing a heavy presumption against its constitutional validity." Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U. S. 58, 70 (1963) [google.com]; see also Near v. Minnesota, 283 U. S. 697 (1931) [google.com]. The Government "thus carries a heavy burden of showing justification for the imposition of such a restraint." Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U. S. 415, 419 (1971) [google.com]. The District Court for the Southern District of New York in the New York Times case and the District Court for the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Washington Post case held that the Government had not met that burden. We agree.
http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1901546&cid=34488372
http://news.slashdot.org/story/10/12/08/1437205/MasterCard-Hit-By-WikiLeaks-Payback-Attacks
"Within a couple days, the WikiLeaks web content has been spread across enough independent parts of the Internet's DNS and routing space that they are, for all intents and purposes, now immune to takedown by any single legal authority," Cowie wrote in his blog. "If pressure were applied, one imagines that the geographic diversity would simply double, and double again."
I am talking to members of a group called “Anonymous”, using a web-based collaborative text-editing service. It is the first such interview for all of us, and their answers begin to collide on the page. One member comes from Norway; another shows surprise, then offers that she is from New Zealand. Another writes that group members come from Nepal and Eastern Russia. They all speak through pseudonyms, but I don't even know which psuedonym comes from what country because shortly after I read these answers, someone who calls himself “Tux” erases them all and writes
We are Everywhere. We are everyone. We are Anonymous.
Paypal and visa are unbeatable, so do is Everydns, and interpol will rape all of us, Postfinance is the most able to suffer our rage, who the **** is lieverman?
He's just a senator. Almost became vice-president, once. It was years ago.
-
The media: again, the media is key. No one has said it better than Monseñor Romero of El Salvador, who just before he was assassinated 25 years ago warned, "The corruption of the press is part of our sad reality, and it reveals the complicity of the oligarchy." Sadly, that is also true of the media situation in America today.
The big question is not whether Americans can "handle the truth." We believe they can. The challenge is to make the truth available to them in a straightforward way so they can draw their own conclusions -- an uphill battle given the dominance of the mainstream media, most of which have mounted a hateful campaign to discredit Assange and WikiLeaks.
So far, the question of whether Americans can "handle the truth" has been an academic rather than an experience-based one, because Americans have had very little access to the truth. Now, however, with the WikiLeaks disclosures, they do. Indeed, the classified messages from the Army and the State Department released by WikiLeaks are, quite literally, "ground truth."
Foreign minister wanted US, Nato and UN backing for offensive to end Iranian-backed Hezbollah's siege of government
Saudi Arabia proposed creating an Arab force backed by US and Nato air and sea power to intervene in Lebanon two years ago and destroy Iranian-backed Hezbollah, according to a US diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks.
The plan would have sparked a proxy battle between the US and its allies against Iran, fought in one of the most volatile regions of the world.
Bank of America (BAC) is worried that it is the target of WikiLeaks and has set up a “war room” to handle the possible release of confidential information on Countrywide, mortgage creation and Merrill Lynch, according to a report by Fox Business Network’s Charlie Gasparino.
According to the report, the “war room” is particularly concerned that WikiLeaks will release information on those three topics. One of Gasparino’s sources has apparently seen documents related to the bank.
The bank’s response to Gasparino: “They said there is no indication they are the target of this particular WikiLeak.”
-------------
http://www.wauland.de/presseerklaerung_accountsperrung.html Google translation.
Press Release of Wau Holland Foundation for the closure of their account with PayPal
The nonprofit foundation Wau Holland has with great surprise learned of the unannounced closure of their PayPal accounts.
Due to this arbitrary decision by the company PayPal, the Foundation currently has no access to donations received in recent days, about 10,000 €, which were donated by donors around the world last Friday and Saturday for the Wikileaks project.
Moreover, the statement published by PayPal that the Wau Holland Foundation supports and promotes "illegal activities" is a slander against which the Foundation has formally denied.
The Foundation has therefore asked a lawyer to initiate action against PayPal. Paypal has been asked to remove this claim from its company blog and restore the unauthorized access to the donation account. WikiLeaks and the Wau Holland Foundation have removed references to the Paypal payment option from their respective websites.
The Wau Holland Foundation will continue to promote projects and activities that meet the objectives of the foundation. These include not only action against voting machines, the support of the TOR anonymizing platform and other projects such as Wikileaks. The Foundation feels this meets the ideals of freedom of the data-philosopher Wau Holland, founder of the Chaos Computer Club, and is committed and supported in accordance with their bylaws: "... global communication, freedom of information and moral courage of electronic media ...".
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, jailed in Britain this week, has told media contacts he has a large cache of U.S. government reports about inmates at the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, known as GITMO, the last of four major tranches of U.S. government documents which WikiLeaks had acquired and at some point would make public.
"He's got the personal files of every prisoner in GITMO," said one person who was in contact with Assange earlier this year.
Today during the Media Panel at LeWeb ’10 in Paris, France, Weblogs SL’s Julio Alonso said, “This is a turning point for the Internet — it’s not just about WikiLeaks anymore. What happens to WikiLeaks will get applied to others later on.”
“This is the first attempt at censorship of the Internet by all the governments of the planet,” Wikio’s Pierre Chappaz added. “Despite all the attacks, I’m optimistic that the information will survive,” he added.
I think you are right – it’s a turning point – but not just for journalism. It’s a turning point because we are seeing very real public disobedience happening around the world. The online #payback is taking place not just against the governments but also against institutions such as PayPal, Visa and MasterCard who are refusing to process payments supporting the Wikileaks organisation.
Is cyberspace about to get censored?
Confronting threats ranging from Chinese superhackers to the release of secret documents on WikiLeaks and other whistleblowing websites, the Obama administration may be on the verge of assuming broad new powers to regulate the Internet on national-security grounds.
The powers are granted to the White House under a bipartisan bill that was introduced in the Senate only last week but is already moving quickly through Congress toward passage. The legislation has generated considerable buzz on tech blogs—but drawn little notice so far by major news organizations.
“The way it seems to be worded, the bill could easily represent a threat to free speech,” said Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
The bill would grant President Obama the power to declare a “national cyber-emergency” at his discretion and force private companies tied to the Web, including Internet service providers and search engines, to take action in response—moves that could include limiting or even cutting off their connections to the World Wide Web for up to 30 days.
everybody alert. gonna get very nasty. They are about to do something very illegal.
Ardin, who also goes by the name Bernardin, has moved to the West Bank in the Palestinian Territories, as part of a Christian outreach group, aimed at bringing reconciliation between Palestinians and Israelis. She has moved to the small town of Yanoun, which sits close to Israel’s security/sequestration wall. Yanoun is constantly besieged by fundamentalist Jewish settlers, and international groups have frequently stationed themselves there.
Attempts by Crikey to contact Ardin by phone, fax, email and twitter were unsuccessful today.
"Certainly to release that sort of information by an officer of the commonwealth, if it were Australian material, would in my view certainly involve criminality," Mr McClelland told a book launch in Sydney.
The legal interpretation came as WikiLeaks supplied Fairfax newspapers with information revealing how Labor powerbroker Mark Arbib gave US officials inside knowledge about former prime minister Kevin Rudd's bid to contain the leadership ambitions of his eventual successor, Julia Gillard.
In October 2009, Senator Arbib told US diplomats Mr Rudd wanted to "ensure that there are viable alternatives to Gillard within the Labor Party to forestall a challenge".
The publication came a day after WikiLeaks released cables suggesting Mr Rudd had been a "control freak" leader.
"Clean up". Now that's a serious LULZ!
I spent half of my electrical engineering career as a Department of Defense contractor. I held both "secret" and "top secret" govt. clearances. I will never reveal what I know. I will take it with me to my grave.
The argument whether Assange/Wikileaks is right is irrelevant. The fact is they have released classified US government documents. This is a serious US Federal offense.
All governments have secret "classified" documents, like it or not. Illegally releasing those type of documents is a crime regardless of their content.
Assange can hide behind UK and Swedish laws. But if he is extradited to the US, all bets are off. He's not a US citizen but if he gets on US soil, I hope they prosecute him to the full extent of the Federal law. US media, specifically NY Times, should also be included since they are just as guilty.
So, hey SQUASHED. You are obviously all about FULL TRANSPARENCY, so who the Fuck are you? You going to keep hiding behind the internet wall like WikiLeaks and those Fucktards "Anonymous" hackers?
Anyways, cutting and pasting pro WikiLeaks internet articles anonymously is lame and something a ten yr. old could do. They could even add a silly one line comment like you do but it would at least be grammatically correct.
O presidente Lula prestou solidariedade nesta quinta-feira (9/12) ao fundador do Wikileaks, Julian Assange, preso esta semana após seu grupo ter divulgado mensagens produzidas pela diplomacia americana, e criticou a imprensa brasileira por não defender o ativista australiano e a liberdade de expressão. ”O rapaz foi preso e eu não estou vendo nenhum protesto contra a [o cerceamento à] liberdade de expressão. É engraçado, não tem nada”, afirmou o presidente, que fez questão de registar o seu:
Ô, Stuckinha (Ricardo Stuckert, fotógrafo oficial da Presidência), pode colocar no Blog do Planalto o primeiro protesto, então, contra a [o cerceamento à] liberdade de expressão na internet, para a gente poder protestar, porque o rapaz estava apenas colocando aquilo que ele leu. E se ele leu porque alguém escreveu, o culpado não é quem divulgou, o culpado é quem escreveu. Portanto, em vez de culpar quem divulgou, culpe quem escreveu a bobagem, porque senão não teria o escândalo que tem. Então, Wikileaks, minha solidariedade pela divulgação das coisas e meu protesto contra a [o cerceamento à] liberdade de expressão.
US embassy cables reveal top executive's claims that company 'knows everything' about key decisions in government ministries
The oil giant Shell claimed it had inserted staff into all the main ministries of the Nigerian government, giving it access to politicians' every move in the oil-rich Niger Delta, according to a leaked US diplomatic cable.
The company's top executive in Nigeria told US diplomats that Shell had seconded employees to every relevant department and so knew "everything that was being done in those ministries". She boasted that the Nigerian government had "forgotten" about the extent of Shell's infiltration and was unaware of how much the company knew about its deliberations.
The cache of secret dispatches from Washington's embassies in Africa also revealed that the Anglo-Dutch oil firm swapped intelligence with the US, in one case providing US diplomats with the names of Nigerian politicians it suspected of supporting militant activity, and requesting information from the US on whether the militants had acquired anti-aircraft missiles.
Other cables released tonight reveal:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/dec/08/wikileaks-cables-shell-nigeria-spying
Oh Amazon. Amazon Web Services stopped hosting the WikiLeaks Cables last week citing that the content was against its Terms of Service.
As first reported on The Next Web, at least one appreciator of irony has now uploaded them to the Kindle store, and you can now buy the otherwise free cables in Amazon Books under the title “WikiLeaks documents expose US foreign policy conspiracies. All cables with tags from 1- 5000.”
From the Amazon blog regarding pulling WikiLeaks from AWS:
“For example, our terms of service state that ‘you represent and warrant that you own or otherwise control all of the rights to the content… that use of the content you supply does not violate this policy and will not cause injury to any person or entity.’ It’s clear that WikiLeaks doesn’t own or otherwise control all the rights to this classified content.”
This is about to get really interesting, as Amazon is now profiting off of content that it has very publicly stated was against its TOS.
http://techcrunch.com/2010/12/09/wikileaks-against-amazons-tos-but-for-sale-in-the-kindle-store/
Russia urges Assange nomination in calculated dig at the US over WikiLeaks founder's detention

* Preocupado EE.UU. por filtración de cómo hace inteligencia
* Wikileaks revelará más documentos pese a captura de Assange
* Wikileaks: OTAN urdió plan secreto para Europa del este
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
For details on the freedom of the press in your country you can have a look at the Reporters Without Boundaries index. It ranks the US on the fabulous 20th place.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Press_Freedom_Index
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/12/07/lieberman-new-york-t.html
According to The Guardian:
The NYT's Bill Keller sought the administration's approval for publishing the leaks beforehand. Is it editorial to suggest that it would seek to enjoy the control he offered it? Or that he signaled a position of weakness and dependency implicitly vulnerable to Joementum?