
totally fantasy economy. How are they going to get money to pay for all those debt? Invading africa and steal all their oil and minerals? I sure as heck don't see how the economy is going to produce so much surplus to pay for government debt.
If there is anything at all less than superlative that can be said about
Apple's consolidated cash hoard, which grew by $12.6 billion in the
quarter and double from a year earlier, is that it is a tad less
exponentially than before. Still, not bad: the country's cash stash is
nearly enough to cover the first Greek bailout (will need to wait 2 more
quarter for it to be sufficient to pay for the fifth one).
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/apple-cash-hits-110-billion-126-billion
All their contracts are in dollar, if the taiwanese and chinese start asking yuan, all those apple dollar isn't going to worth anything. What they gonna do? building factory with 120K worker in Texarkana somewhere? how are they going to feed that many workers? And what about rare earth?
The
Beebster can talk himself blue in the face about this but, in fact,
this is a major economic and diplomatic blow to Israel's future welfare.
The fact that this has occurred BEFORE the Islamist and basically anti-Israeli forces in Egypt are fully empowered is ominous.
IMO it is only a matter of time before the Egyptians withdraw from the treaty of peace with Israel. pl
turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2012/04/httpabcnewsgocombusinesswirestoryegypt-terminates-gas-deal-israel-16190708.html#comments
that much is obvious. 5 yrs...maybe less. Next big diplomatic implosion is the collapse of house of saud. It'll take a miracle to maintain current status quo longer than a decade.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10796452
7%? that's huge advantage.
http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20120424p2g00m0bu084000c.html
oh please... not gonna happen.
3. A best in class risk technique that stop losses the narrative and
responds early with loss mitigation procedures (i.e. a method of staying
solvent, rational and disciplined under pressure).
I have always figured that the first is the real key. That success
was simply a matter of contentious macro posturing. In other words,
going long very rich risk premium or buying cheap stuff. It is my
assertion that what makes a great fund manager first and foremost is the
ability to establish a contentious premise outside the existing belief
system and have it go on to become adopted by the broader financial
community. Bruce Kovner expressed the idea more eloquently when he said,
“I have the ability to imagine configurations of the world different
from today and really believe it can happen. I can imagine...that the
dollar can fall to 100 yen”. I am sure you are nodding in agreement,
except Bruce was saying this when the USDJPY was well over 200, not
today's rate of 80!
That is the kind of guy I want to be when I grow up. Recall that I
have the kind of imagination that can conceive of the yen trading closer
to 60. Similarly, if we look back and reminisce about previous years,
the Fund's 50% return in 2003 was derived from a legitimate but
certainly contentious view that China's WTO entry was set to boost the
cyclical "old" economy of the West and that fiat hyper-management of the
financial economy could propel gold into a super bull market. To think
these views were once contentious; plus ça change!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/hugh-hendry-back-full-eclectica-letter
1. yen can only go up without active intervention of BOJ. Japan is not some cripple european PIGS banana republics like Ireland or Latvia. At the same time, their modern economy is strictly built on export machine. But its industrial base is intake, as shown how they survive the last earthquake. The country's industrial bureaucracy works like a clock. Yes, this include the nuke blow up. The fact that japan can make the fifth largest earthquake in history looks like just another messy natural disaster is mind boggling to me. If it happens at any other place it'll be total collapse, Haiti style.
The so called smart european bankers can't even survive the chain reaction of US sub prime collapse.
2. at 100 Yen, US car industry will be destroyed period. at 120 anything made out of steel and run on electricity will be pwnd by japanese. at 200, nothing survives. Even Boeing will move to Japan to make their jet. (I am not sure what kind of crack this hugh guy is smoking. But he should actually see how things are made instead of walking around in chinese city wearing "fund manager" glasses.
20 micro second buy/sell decision does not make real long term national wealth. What is the big deal about factory over investment? this as oppose to paper asset bubble. When things exploded, guess who still have "machines" to get back producing, as oppose to paper asset gone?
Guess who will move forward and bring price even lower while everybody goes bankrupt? Price of polysilicone, aluminum and steel would be great example. Guess who will control the future of all industry based on those raw materials?
Carnegie didn't get rich by hussling as "fund" manager. He did exactly what the chinese is doing right now.
The market began in Lloyd's Coffee House, opened by Edward Lloyd
around 1688 in Tower Street, London. This establishment was a popular
place for sailors, merchants, and ship owners, and Lloyd catered to them
with reliable shipping news. The shipping industry community frequented
the place to discuss insurance deals among themselves. Just after
Christmas 1691, the coffee shop relocated to Lombard Street (a blue plaque
commemorates this location). This arrangement carried on until 1774,
long after Lloyd's death in 1713, when the participating members of the
insurance arrangement formed a committee and moved to the Royal Exchange on Cornhill as The Society of Lloyd's.
Global food prices rose in
the first four months of 2012, pushed higher by volatile world
oil prices, strong demand for food imports from Asia and adverse
weather conditions in parts of Europe, South America and United
States, the World Bank said on Wednesday.
The latest World Bank food price index shows the cost of
food increased by eight percent between December and March, just
6 percent below their February 2011 historical peak.
The poverty-fighting institution said the prices of all key
staple foods rose over the four-month period except for rice. It
said abundant supplies of rice and strong competition among
exporters pushed the international rice price lower.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/25/worldbank-food-idUSL2E8FP40020120425
total insanity. countdown until bunch of regime changes...This time in europe.
Charting soybean prices - no hedonic adjustments here.
What is the reason for the dramatic surge in prices?
Soyabean prices have risen more than 10 per cent in the past month to
hit a peak of $15.09 a bushel on Friday, the highest in four years.
Other sources of edible oil, including rapeseed and canola, have also
reached levels last seen during the 2007-08 food crisis.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/another-bout-global-food-inflation-just-around-corner
That March factory orders declined 1.5% was not very surprising: the
market was expecting a decline of 1.6%. However, this is not good news
as the prior February increase of 1.3% was revised lower to 1.1%,
netting out as a negative two month change. Where this number was
troubling is that this 2.6% swing brought the index to its biggest
decline since March 2009 when the pumping of trillions started.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/us-factory-orders-post-biggest-decline-march-2009
The effect on that "gasoline spike" from iran embargo start to take a bite. Few months from now, people gonna cry..."why another Lehman"... If there is just one explosion in european refinery or a ship getting so much as a scratch in the gulf.... prepare for massive "bubble" popping...
Instagram will not worth $1Billion, I can tell you that.
I guess now it's the time to take inventory of all:
a) wishful thinking, super bubble, we can make it whole again, if price keep going up just a little more sector.
b) insanely leveraged asset, institutions
c) hedge on commodity, or anything that crosses "dollar-euro-asian curreincies" they are not going to be able to pay.
d) The day of reckoning for all too big too fail banks.. European first, then bananas like well fargo, bofa.
e) all weak industries that depends on long term loan, long term mortgage, new loan, debt, etc...will die.
f) pray the chinese and japanese are in kind mood and not pulling all their asset at the same time while things are imploding.
g) pray Israelis are actually afraid of gas chambers and extermination if they instigate yet one more global economic collapse and major regional war.
h) pray the iranian isn't coordinating their attack to trigger the biggest Euro-Dollar zone collapse, because whatever they are doing is working nicely.
To put it simply...there are too many fragile parts that will quickly lead to total collapse.
The Euro-zone youth unemployment rate is back over 22% for the first time since September 1994. With Spain and Greece over 50% (and rising) and Italy now joining Ireland over 35% at the same time as Germany's youth unemployment falls below 8% for the first time since May 1993 - one can only surmise the rising tensions between the haves and the have-nots (even as Germany's PMI disappoints).
For comparison, the US is not exactly sunshine and roses, with 16-17
year-olds back near 30% unemployment and 18-19 year-olds back over 22% -
even as 20-22 year-olds improve gradually.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/europes-scariest-chart-just-got-scarier-er
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/adp-misses-big-prints-lowest-increase-september-manufacturing-jobs-post-shocking-declineSomewhere in whitehouse compound, somebody is curling at the office corner and see how the economy is about to implode globally. And wish they didn't pull idiotic oil move. Too late now... The avalanche has started.
Espen Gaarder Haug and Nassim Nicholas Taleb
argue that the Black–Scholes model merely recast existing widely used
models in terms of practically impossible "dynamic hedging" rather than
"risk," to make them more compatible with mainstream neoclassical economic theory.[12] Similar arguments were made in an earlier paper by Emanuel Derman and Nassim Taleb.[13] In response, Paul Wilmott has defended the model.[9]
Jean-Philippe Bouchaud argues: Reliance on models based on incorrect axioms has clear and large effects. The Black–Scholes model,[14]
for example, which was invented in 1973 to price options, is still used
extensively. But it assumes that the probability of extreme price
changes is negligible, when in reality, stock prices are much jerkier
than this. Unwarranted use of the model spiralled into the worldwide
October 1987 crash; the Dow Jones index dropped 23% in a single day,
dwarfing recent market hiccups.[citation needed] Using the Student's t-distribution in place of the normal distribution as basis for the valuation of options can better take in account extreme events.

And for those who still believe that insurmanoutable debt is suicide, we have good news, you are right, at least according to a new paper by Reinhart, Rogoff and Reinhart (via The American):
– We identify 26 episodes of public debt overhang–where debt to GDP
ratios exceed 90% of GDP–since 1800. We find that in 23 of these 26
episodes, individual countries experienced lower growth than the
average of other years. Across all 26 episodes, growth is lower by an average of 1.2%.
– If this effect sounds modest, consider that the average duration of debt overhang episodes was 23 years. In 11 of the 26 high debt overhang episodes, real interest rates were the same or lower than in other periods.
– Obviously, it is possible that new developments in technology and
globalization will provide such a remarkable reservoir of growth that
today’s record debt burdens will eventually prove quite manageable. On
the other hand, the fact many countries are facing “quadruple debt
overhang problems”—public, private, external, and pension–suggests the
problem could in fact be worse than in the past, a question we do not tackle here.
– Nor have we paid attention here to the likely possibility of
significant “hidden debts”, especially public sector, which Reinhart and
Rogoff (2009) find to be a significant factor in many debt crises, and
as documented in detail in the Reinhart (2010) chartbook. Another line
of reasoning for dismissing concerns about public debt and growth is
the view the causality mostly runs from growth to debt.
– Our analysis, based on these cases and the 23 others we identify, suggests that the long term risks of high debt are real.
Feldstein on the U.S. economy:
"We are not doing very well. The economy is just
coming along at a snail's pace. The first quarter numbers that we just
got last week were not very good at all. The GDP number was 2.2%. That
was a disappointment, but you know, it was all automobiles. 1.6 out of
the 2.2 was motor vehicle production. So, people were catching up after
not being able to buy them the year before. So, this is a very weak
economy. The payroll employment numbers, we are going to get some new
ones in April. Let's hope they are better than March where it fell by
half. The stock market is, I think, responding to the Fed. I
think the real danger is that this is a bubble in the stock market
created by low long-term interest rates that the Fed has engineered."
On the danger of a bubble in the stock market:
"The danger is, like all bubbles, they burst at some point.
Remember, Ben Bernanke told us in the summer of 2010 that he was going
to do QE2 and then ultimately they did Operation Twist. The purpose of
that was to make long-term bonds less attractive so that investors would
buy into the stock market. That would raise wealth and higher wealth would lead to more consumption.
It helped in the fourth quarter of 2010 and maybe that is what is
helping to drive consumption during the first quarter of this year. But
the danger is you get a market that is not with the reality of what is
happening in the economy, which is, as I said a moment ago, is really
not very good at all."
Hey Einstein...forget about how somebody created a bubble....It's now about to pop.... we gonna have dot.com bubble version 2.0.
And this time, it's not going to be "housing subprime" bubble that will patch dot.com bubble. It will instead be Asia pulling money out of the popping bubble. ... Dollar liquidity will drain out overnight. (assuming there is no Israel-Iran war)
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/hugh-hendry-europe-you-cant-make-how-bad-it
lolol..euro dollar parity??? ... NOT GOING TO HAPPEN............... it will destroy america/dollar economy. Ben bernank will keep printing dollar and buy euro until it's $1.20
That's Mercedes at the price of Chevy!!! The entire US economy will die three times over at that price.
Bloomberg authors By Steve Matthews and Tom Keene report Greenspan Says U.S. Stocks ‘Very Cheap,’ Likely to Rise
Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said U.S. stocks offer
good value and are likely to rise as corporate earnings increase over
time.
“Stocks are very cheap,” Greenspan said today at the Bloomberg
Washington Summit hosted by Bloomberg Link, citing “a very low
price-earnings ratio.”
“There is no place for earnings to grow except into stock prices,” said
Greenspan, who served as Fed chairman from August 1987 to January 2006.
Another valuation metric, known as the Fed model because it was derived
from a July 1997 report from the central bank, shows U.S. equities are
close to the cheapest level ever relative to debt. The technique
compares the earnings yield for stocks with Treasury rates.
----------------
Trying to pump the stock market ... something is up.


Changes in the number of hours worked per week by both groups did not
make up for the loss in wages: an uptick in the hours worked among all
private sector employees left their real total weekly wages (a product
of the hourly wage and hours worked per week) unchanged, while an
increase in hours for production and nonsupervisory workers still
resulted in 0.5 percent decline in real total weekly wages.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/05/03/1088519/-Wage-growth-decline-puts-drag-on-economic-recovery


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/wti-100
lessee if they are dumb enough to start a war of print more money before the election.


Socialist Francois Hollande has been elected as France's new president, early estimates say.
He got about 52% of votes in Sunday's run-off, according to
projections based on partial results, against 48% for centre-right
incumbent Nicolas Sarkozy.
Mr Hollande would be the first French socialist president since 1995.
Analysts say the vote has wide implications for the whole
eurozone. Mr Hollande has vowed to rework a deal on government debt in
member countries.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-17975660
The european public is not in the mood to entertain banksterism. Next to go will be US based zionism military antics. Just watch... next thing you know the european start cutting off line to the US. after withdrawing support on all military operation.
His policies are certainly radical, by today's standards, but whether or not they will work remains to be seen.
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francois_Hollande#Policies
http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/t9xm8/socialist_francois_hollande_wins_french_presidency/

With 95 percent of votes counted, the
conservative New Democracy (ND) and socialist PASOK, who have dominated
Greece for decades, is seen falling short of the 151-seat threshold
needed for even the most fragile majority in parliament.
"The
PASOK did unexpectedly poorly in the election ... Until we have more
clarity on how the coalition government will be formed and what the new
government will do with the bailout scheme, the euro will stay under
pressure," said Masafumi Yamamoto, chief FX strategist at Barclays.
The
euro fell as far as $1.29552, its lowest since January 25, breaking
below the rough $1.30-$1.35 trading band it had been stuck in since
February. The euro last traded at $1.2978, down 0.8 percent from late
U.S. levels last Friday.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/07/us-markets-forex-idUSBRE83Q0O120120507
Euro is diving... see how low ben bernank will let it go... repeat of few months before.. 1.25, 1.20 .. at least brent will go down in relation to dollar. this will fuel asian growth a little.
Well, that lasted far less than the three days expected:
And now the broad-left coalition Syriza gets the mandate to form a
coalition government. If successful, and with nearly 60% of the parties
in parliament being anti-bailout it would not take much for differences
to be resolved, all bets are off as the anti-bailout powers will finally
gain control of Greece, effectively ending European control over
Greece. Alternatively, if nothing is achieved, then it is very likely
that Greece will have another election within 3-4 weeks. And then
another. And then another.
yes, until the people fed up and start executing those clowns and appoint Ceasar. Current form of representative democracy is dead anyway, everywhere it's the same, a corrupt scoundrels controlled by this and that cartel. Not working for the people or country.
I expect sooner of later public will start examining the foundation of current political system since it's deeply flawed. Too easily co-opted.
Under the rules, U.S. financial institutions could be
unable to maintain “sufficient” amounts of reserves in their
current accounts with foreign central banks, Yamamoto said.
Limits relating to non-U.S. sovereign debt securities may reduce
liquidity and hinder money-market operations that use them as
collateral, the official said.
“The counterparties of the Bank of Japan (8301) in conducting
money-market operations include a number of U.S. financial
institutions with current accounts with the bank,” Yamamoto
said. “The proposed rule therefore could reduce the
effectiveness of the bank’s monetary policy conduct, and hamper
the daily payments and settlements via the current accounts with
the bank.”
Yamamoto added that the Bank of Japan believes the Fed will
find a “creative and practical solution” and avoid unintended
consequences through international talks.
The Fed plans to limit financial firms with at least $500
billion in assets from having credit risk to any other exceeding
10 percent of its regulatory capital plus excess loan-loss
reserves. That is stricter than a 25 percent restriction that’s
applied more broadly to banks in the Dodd-Frank financial-
overhaul law.
....oooooohhh.......so, like..there isn;t enough 'real' money around if they can't use fake asset under new rule?
Have you done any ground work?
The economic
structures are so different that we will have to work our way through.
All of us are trying to use our own currencies for trade rather than
third country's currency. The volatility on the US dollar has gone up
tremendously, impacting exporters. There has to be some mechanism of
insulating these smaller chaps from volatility. And the simplest would
be a kind of a local currency settlement. But for a single currency
settlement, you got to have balance of trade. Our trade balance with
China is one sided, with Brazil it is more or less in balance. South
Africa is also more or less in balance. Russia also it is not much.
China has a positive with most of the countries. And local currency settlement
means that ultimately you have to get the local currency to pay for it.
Best payments mechanism, which is steady and long-term, is that they
must have exports are going up in an equal measure or capital going at
an equal measure.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
The equation was not at fault: the
output is only as good as the inputs. The real problem was the
instruments being traded: credit default swaps. These are of dubious
merit and much more complicated than more traditional underlying
instruments (the thing on which you hold an option contract). For
example, suppose you have an option to be 100 shares of Google at a
given price. It's easy to evaluate the value of the underlying
instrument because there's an efficient market for it: Google is traded
on a public exchange and the value is agreed upon within a penny,
generally. Black-Scholes works on Google options just fine and you can
minimize your risk reasonable well using it.
The credit default
swaps were much more difficult to evaluate because of the lack of an
efficient market for them. The essential nature of the underlying
instrument were very high risk mortgages, not too different in concept
from so-called junk bonds. The potential return was high because the
interest rate was high. The potential risk was high because the risk of
default was high, making the underlying instrument worth very little,
much less than face value. So take these risky mortgages and then buy
insurance policies for them, this is standard practice. That hedges the
risk of the actual mortgage itself. Bundle the mortgage and the
insurance policy up into a quasi-mutual fund like product: you have x
number of mortgage/insurance policy bundles with average risk of default
at y. Getting more difficult to put a value on, especially since there
is no regulated exchange for them and little oversight.
Not done
yet. Add in that deregulation rules passed during the Clinton era
allowed the banks that issue the mortgages and buy the insurance
policies to also use their assets to trade on their own. This group
within a group is called "proprietary trading". So, the prop-trading
groups within the banks buy and sell the mortgages and insurance
policies to each other in order to generate income for the bank. There
are also other groups that buy and sell these instruments that don't
actually issue mortgages. These are called speculative traders.
Finally,
to put the finishing touches on this pile of doo, have a group create a
new instrument: a binary option (it does or it doesn't) on a bundle of
high-risk mortgages and their insurance policies. A binary option is
essentially a gamble: it pays out if something happens, it does not pay
out if something doesn't happen. Now you're buying and selling options
contracts which predict whether a group of mortgages will fail or not.
There's no regulation, no formal exchange (which helps create market
efficiency). There's no reliable way to determine the value of the
underlying instrument because it depends on knowing how many of the
mortgages will fail. And don't forget that the banks were using their
investment customers to create demand for a product they wanted to sell
("I think you should invest in such-and-such") without telling the
customers that the banks themselves would be profiting by selling
questionable instruments to their own customers.
This is the magic
of unregulated capitalism (almost - the banks should have been allowed
to fail in a purely unregulated capitalism system). Nothing wrong with
Black-Scholes here. The real problem at the core is that the banks
involved are so driven by short-term success that there is no room for
sanity. Wrap it all up with the fact that the banks know they
will be bailed out by the Feds if they fail. There is no penalty for
risk and no regulatory oversight. Gotta have one or the other or we just
plain deserve this insanity.