
Below is the maturity schedule in August from the BPC:
And their commentary, which recaps what we said 14 months ago:
The CBPP adjustments, however, change only the policy
assumptions embedded in the CBO figures, not the economic ones.
And yet the deficit is very sensitive to economic growth. So I
asked Richard Kogan, a senior fellow at the CBPP and one of the
nation’s leading budget experts, to alter the economic
assumptions to reflect a hard-slog scenario.
The CBO assumes economic growth will exceed 3 percent per
year from 2012 to 2016 before gradually declining to a bit more
than 2 percent in 2021. What if, instead, growth remains at 2
percent to 2.5 percent for the next decade? I asked Kogan to
recalculate the budget numbers assuming a constant growth rate
of 2.25 percent per year, which seems a plausible hard-slog
scenario.
He found that the deficit then averages more than 7 percent
of GDP. By 2021, it is more than 8.5 percent of GDP and
increasing.
Under these modified growth assumptions, the cumulative
deficit for the next decade is $13.7 trillion. In other words,
the impact from sluggish growth on the budget shortfall over the
same period exceeds $2.5 trillion -- which is more than the
roughly $2 trillion in deficit reduction that may wind up being
agreed to as part of a deal to lift the debt ceiling.
(Failing to reach such a deal over the debt limit by early
August, by the way, would lead to economic catastrophe and
further cloud the unemployment outlook.)
There’s always Japan. Two immediate problems come to mind.
One, 10-year bonds yield a piddling 1.06 percent, about a third
of the return on comparable U.S. bonds. Two, with about 95
percent of Japan’s debt outstanding tucked under tatami mats at
home, China couldn’t get its hands on enough to make the
exercise worthwhile. Bond markets elsewhere in Asia are either
too small or too illiquid to help.
As 2011 unfolds, the Bretton Woods II architecture that
Asia created after the 1997 crisis isn’t just crumbling -- it’s
putting trillions of dollars of state wealth at risk. Romantic
notions about returning to the original Bretton Woods world of
the gold standard are unrealistic in a global system as
leveraged and nontransparent as ours. So is saving its
successor, which saw Asia establishing de facto pegs to the
dollar and amassing mountains of reserves to protect them.
If that is the thinking, then the game is over for dollar in about a decade. Chian Mai multilateral means entire west pacific money circulation is monitored. And protected using $5T worth of total reserve plus 5-8% growth. The assumption of bond price and national goal is definitely wrong. Again and again, the idiot in charge seems not to understand the point of holding US bond. It is NOT to store value/enrich oneself. It is to control dollar exchange by balancing circulation, thus price competitiveness/exchange rate. whether one hold $3Billion bond or $3Trillion bond is accidental. what's more as dollar circulation in the world becomes smaller, it is easier to control exchange rate. which is where we at now.
Post-war dollar role is about to be over. US economy (15%) is not big enough to dictate dollar price as global reserve. As it should, natural 19th century balance is returning. Europe should be biggest, if not china, but both are not politically ready yet. So things are getting funky.
I for one say, the current game will persist until dollar total collapse or European politics completely crack due to super high euro price. Bernanke printing press obviously is not big enough to flood the world to force everybody to change tack. $2-3T new money is nothing. Asia absorbed half of it a year, latam and africa another quarter, the rest will be destroyed via shadow banking. And bernank isn't going to be able to print more than that without turning dollar into toilet paper overnight. People will riot on the street if price collapse 200% in a week.
So I was angry. Watching TV news over dinner — turning my attention from scandals
in the UK to those here and frankly welcoming the distraction from the
tragedies in Norway — I listened to the latest from Washington about
negotiations over the debt ceiling. It pissed me off. I’d had enough.
After dinner, I tweeted:
“Hey, Washington assholes, it’s our country, our economy, our money.
Stop fucking with it.” It was the pinot talking (sounding more like a
zinfandel).
That’s all I was going to say. I had no grand design on a revolution.
I just wanted to get that off my chest. That’s what Twitter is for:
offloading chests. Some people responded and retweeted, which pushed me
to keep going, suggesting a chant: “FUCK YOU WASHINGTON.” Then the mellifluously monikered tweeter @boogerpussy suggested: “.@jeffjarvis Hashtag it: #FUCKYOUWASHINGTON.” Damn, I was ashamed I hadn’t done that. So I did.
And then it exploded as I never could have predicted. I egged it on
for awhile, suggesting that our goal should be to make
#fuckyouwashington a trending topic, though as some tweeters quickly
pointed out, Twitter censors moderates topics. Soon enough, though, Trendistic showed us gaining in Twitter share and Trendsmap showed us trending in cities and then in the nation.
Now Lory Montgomery, of the Washington Post reports, Boehner presses ahead with unilateral debt plan
In a conference call with House Republicans, Speaker John A. Boehner
(R-Ohio) said he would press ahead with a two-stage strategy that would
give the Treasury only about $1 trillion in additional borrowing
authority, forcing another debt-limit battle early next year with the
political parties in the heat of the 2012 presidential campaign.
“If we stick together, we can win this for the American people,” Boehner told his troops, participants said.
Durbin: Bob, let me tell you what the problem is.
Those who give us a rating, a credit rating, for the United States of
America -- Moody's, Fitch, Standard & Poor -- have told us "Don't do
that." A short-term extension of the debt ceiling is going to
jeopardize our economy at a time when the global economy is so weak,
when we are facing a downgrade of America's credit rating. They have warned us not to do it and Speaker Boehner is ignoring that warning. We can't do that.
I'll tell you what will happen. We know that Majority Leader Cantor
walked out of the negotiations with Vice President Biden. We know that
Speaker Boehner walked out of negotiations with the President, not once,
but twice. And now, the reality is if we fail to extend the
debt ceiling of the United States, we will be imposing a new tax on
working families and businesses across America. They'll see it in their credit cards. They'll see it in their home loans, in their automobile loans. This is a tax which will be imposed because speaker Boehner refuses to consider a tax on the wealthiest people in America.
Scheiffer: All right, but -- I take your point on
all of that, but wouldn't it be better to pass a short-term extension to
raise the debt limit than just letting this thing go?
Durbin: Well, we absolutely do not want to default. But this
notion that we're going to replay this movie in four or five months,
that we're going to face this whole thing all over again, the American
economy is too fragile at this point in recovery for us to allow that to
happen. We've been warned, not by political advisors -- I
hear the Republicans, they want to make this a campaign issue. Ignore
the political advisors for a moment. Listen to the economists who are
telling us, all of them together, "Do not lurch from one five-month
period to another when it comes to the credit rating of the United
States of America, not at this moment in history. It's going to hurt
us. It's going to stall our recovery and I might say to Speaker Boehner
he should remember six words: if you break it, you own it. In
this situation, he has the responsibility to lead his Republican caucus
and to help this nation move forward in a stronger economy.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/24/998138/-Durbin-Sticks-it-to-the-GOP?via=siderec
The Last Remission
According to the official figures put out by the US government, the
economic “recovery” in the US celebrated its second anniversary on June
30, 2011. The “fuel” burned in this “recovery” is immense. Mr Obama’s
presidency has ushered in the era of $US 1 TRILLION plus annual deficits
riding on top of 0.00 percent controlling interest rates from the Fed.
It has also ushered in the era in which almost nothing istraded on the
paper markets which is not - explicitly or implicitly - guaranteed by
the government.

The Dow was down
512.76 points to 11,383.68; the broader S&P 500 lost 4.8 percent to
1,200.07, while the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite plunged 5.1 percent to
2,556.39.
Opening salvo of the $2Trillion currency war has been pretty spectacular so far. It's gigantic-mega-giga-super large size money being moved around. No hedge fund is going to survive this battle for sure. Because hedge fund computing algo is now the target. (The only easy target left. Sovereign funds and central banks are now the gamblers)
I wonder where Soro is right now? ...lol. Is he still shorting euro? His cash will looks like 6th grader lunch money compared to the movers.
All the authorities did was patch up a predatory banking system with
duct tape and bailing wire and hoped enough cheerleading would restore
confidence. And after the banks got their bailout money, the mood seemed
to be “we spent so much on them, we don’t have anything left for anyone
else.” The alarming rise in government deficits, which was primarily
the result of the crisis (falls in tax revenues and increases in
automatic stabliizers like unemployment payments) and not discretionary
spending, has led to a deadly combination of austerian policies (which
is making debt to GDP ratios worse, see Ireland, Latvia, and Greece for
proof), dysfunctional government responses, faltering recoveries, and
deliberate shredding of social contracts. It’s like watching a house
burn and then having people throw Molotov cocktails at it.
The pattern of serious financial crises is the market meltdown hits
first, then the real economy plunge takes place later. Our officialdom
had been patting itself on the back that “better” policy responses had
stopped the sort of damage that the US suffered in the Great Depression
and Japan experienced in its post bubble hangover. But the GDP revisions
of last week included some stunning reductions to 2008 figures which
called the comparatively cheery story we’ve been told into question. And
the powers that be have refused to take the important step of writing
bad debt down. Zombification was treated as the solution to our woes,
when the result of past financial crises shows that taking the losses
early which does result in a worse initial GDP hit, leads to much better
outcomes. And here, the casualty has been not only growth but to a fair
degree our political system, as the corporocrats have used the crisis
to solidify their position.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/08/market-craters.html
The final collapse of the international free trade floating fiat
currency game is not here just yet but looming on the horizon. The
entire premise of this system is, all nations should be allowed to
import into the country with the strongest currency regime! This
usually was the US markets which has soaked up around $4-5 trillion in
trade red ink, fueling a global hot trade market game. But the US is
now going slowly bankrupt and to keep this regime running one way only
requires all other nations to constantly weaken their own currencies vis
a vis the US dollar. This is increasingly impossible as the US dollar
is losing great value every day as it collapses due primarily to the
creation of far too much ZIRP credit. The desire for infinite debt
money creation versus the power of zero embedded in the concept of ZIRP
money lending is coming to a breaking point pretty fast.
First, the $2 trillion plus compromise we hear
about so often is slated to take place not over the next ten months, but
the next ten years! Only $917 billion in cuts are officially mandated by the bill. The final $1.5 trillion will be voted upon at a later date. Only
$21 billion in cuts will be applied to discretionary spending in 2012,
$42 billion in 2013, and the remaining cuts after 2014. This
strategy, by itself, is wholly inadequate in making even the slightest
dent in our national debt, being that our government’s spending has
grown exponentially with each passing year.
In June of 2009, our national debt stood at $11.5 Trillion. Today, it climbs past $14.5 trillion. That’s an increase of $3 trillion in the span of two years. Now, I don’t know where men like Boehner, Reid, or Obama, learned simple math, but I can tell you their numbers don’t add up. Even
if current spending levels stay static (which they won’t), by 2013, we
will have to increase the national debt to at least $17.5 trillion,
while only cutting $63 billion from the budget. Wow….sounds like progress to me.
Here is a chart of what could well be the biggest concern for the
market, and one we have been highlights for a long time: mutual fund
cash levels, which as ICI indicates were 3.4% in June,
is the lowest ever. A 4% drop in the absolute value of mutual fund
investments, effectively wipes out the capital buffer of most. Enter
liquidations.
On fundamentals, the stock plunge makes no sense. We’ve never had
this kind of market bloodshed with a corporate earnings above 7% (and
well above 8% on a forward-based bottom-up estimate), and the monetary
authorities ready to provide unlimited liquidity to the market.
Corporate earnings are solid–we aren’t talking about the phony
financials’ earnings of 2006 or dot.coms with burn rates of 2000. The
problem is one of market segmentation.
90% of US equities are
held by the top 10% of the population in terms of net worth, that is,
households who are more concerned about capital preservation than
income. 90% of US households have most of their net worth in homes or
in small business equity, and remain paralyzed for the duration.
Pension funds and insurers should be massive buyers of dividend stocks
at these levels, but have little dry powder. The equity market crash of
2007-2008 forced them into bonds, and their book yields remain much
higher than the yields available. It makes little sense for them to
liquidate assets now booked at a premium in order to buy into the
equity market.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/284779-the-great-hedge-fund-de-levering-event-has-arrived
Figure 1: Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, Calamos.com
The numbers are even starker when viewed through the lense of
forward-looking annual real yield on ten-year treasuries, which
pencils out to a paltry 0.6%, assuming annualized inflation of 2.4% a
year.
Obviously the inflation numbers are highly suspect, as is anything
coming out of Washington these days, but this is what we've got to
work with.
I find myself struck by a terrible sense of déjà vu, because the U.S.
- debt deal or not - appears to be charting a course down the same
troubled path Japan has trod since 1990, which is something I first
noted in early 2000, based upon my first-hand experience in that
nation.
Unfortunately, this path is likely to be characterized by the same
problems: sovereign debt overburden that makes the Greeks look
positively miserly, stagnant national wealth, and slow GDP growth
despite trillions in "stimulus" that is unlikely to create any real
returns whatsoever.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article29726.html
There is one big difference between current US situation and japan ...
One is HUGE POSITIVE, the other is HUGE NEGATIVE. One is hardly monetizing in relation to overall currency standing, the other is.
S&P is likely to cut its ratings on municipal debt secured
by the federal government, such as pre-refunded bonds, tax-
exempts backed by U.S. agencies, and credits that are most
dependent on federal spending, Peter DeGroot, head of municipal
research at JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), wrote in an Aug. 5 report
distributed after the federal downgrade. The New York-based
ratings company said it would release a statement on state and
local issuers today.
“There will be hundreds and hundreds of municipal
downgrades, which will not do well to bolster investor
confidence,” Matt Fabian, a managing director of Concord,
Massachusetts-based Municipal Market Advisors, said in a
telephone interview. “Treasuries may be able to shake off a
real impact from the downgrade. Munis I’m less sure about.”
Municipal issuance has fallen amid the U.S. debt-ceiling
impasse. The slump and signs of a slowing economy helped drive
tax-exempt yields to the lowest this year. Scheduled debt sales
total about $2.8 billion this week, the slowest August week
since 2003, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.


Brazil is off about 30% from its highs. As of this evening, Shanghai has just kissed the 20% bear market threshold.
Russia is down almost 25% from its high. India’s Sensex index is down
18.5%, still eluding bear market territory. On a composite basis, we’re
in a BRIC bear market.
It’s a warning shot across the bow for commodity currencies and emerging markets (both equities and debt).
It was just 4 days ago that the BOJ purchased Y4.5 trillion (or $58
billion) worth of dollars in the open market to lower the Yen against
the dollar. Well, that intervention last not even a full 4 days. As the
chart below shows it is time for Shirakawa and Noda to start watching...
watching... watching... the yen as it once again approaches all time
highs against the dollar. But at least the equity market is confused
enough to believe that 2 years of projected deflation is good for risk.
Ben wins.... if only for a few hours. The irony is that everyone
expected that a fixed inflation (or in this deflation) calendar language
is the weakest of the Fed's options. Now that this is precisely what
has been utilized, a soft form of Operation Twist 2 which locks in the
rates on the 2 Years as explained previously, the market is cheering it
deliriously. Once the market has slept on it, it will likely realize why
it was so skeptical as recently as 2 hours ago on the viability of this
approach.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/look-how-58-billion-usd-purchases-buys-you-4-days-fx-intervention
Well, at the very least Toyota, Honda and Mrs. Watanabe are able to liquidate and repatriate their dollar asset at 5% premium. (I bet there was a lot of japanese money bailing out from wall st.) It was an epic crash. Come to think of it. It was a friggin brilliant move. (everybody panic, and funds/idiots need to buy US bond to move cash from equity before jumping off the window. So, japan can get rid of the lowest yield bond. plus bring back cash home in that short window.)
We'll see if BOJ will intervene again. If they do it bigger and the panic will be even bigger. Those mutual fund and hedge fund are all going bust. QE3 is going to screw everybody anyway, so fuckitall.
I wonder what china is thinking. I swear they are thinking something BIG. The ultimate FU/stfu market move. (what good is owning money and power if not to use it?)
They call themselves the “Xinjiang
13.” They have been denied permission to enter China, prohibited
from flying on a Chinese airline and pressured to adopt China-
friendly views. To return to China, two wrote statements
disavowing support for the independence movement in Xinjiang
province.
They aren’t exiled Chinese dissidents. They are American
scholars from universities, such as Georgetown and Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, who have suffered a backlash from China
unprecedented in academia since diplomatic relations resumed in
1979. Their offense was co-writing “Xinjiang: China’s Muslim
Borderland,” a 484-page paperback published in 2004.
The structure of the control network of transnational
corporations affects global market competition and financial stability.
So far, only small national samples were studied and there was no
appropriate methodology to assess control globally. We present the first
investigation of the architecture of the international ownership
network, along with the computation of the control held by each global
player. We find that transnational corporations form a giant bow-tie
structure and that a large portion of control flows to a small
tightly-knit core of financial institutions. This core can be seen as an
economic "super-entity" that raises new important issues both for
researchers and policy makers.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!