I was just looking for a track earlier and discovered that Eclectic Eavesdropping (who admittedly, I'd never heard of until just now) had been deleted by Wordpress.com. The guy who runs the site said on his Facebook page - http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=119335231420468&v=wall - that what killed the blog was posting a couple of streams for some Adele songs. And he also mentioned it's the second time it's happened on three years - but I'm not sure whether both deletions were on Wordpress.
Obviously there was that massive uproar last year when Google deleted a string of music blogs on Blogger but I hadn't heard about Wordpress deleting music blogs until today. The emphasis there being on "music" blogs. Is it a common occurence?
@ Sean - The Fair Use Doctrine has been tested in court and is not "hypothetical" at all.
The language used by Congress in Title 17, Section 107 specifically lists criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research as examples of uses that might be protected under fair use. However, this list is non-exhaustive, and therefore a use not covered in one of the categories could nonetheless be successfully defended as a fair use. Conversely, not every use that falls within the listed categories will necessarily be found by a court to be fair. For example, not every use of another's work for research or educational purposes will be held to be a fair use. See Encyclopaedia Britannica Educational Corp. v. Crooks, 542 F.Supp. 1156 (W.D.N.Y.1982).
Once again, I stand lay curled in a fetal position, corrected.

saamFG said:The streaming issue is something that I find it more of a grey area. Labels however seem to see streaming links as just as "damaging" as download links. Maybe there'll eventually be some sort of paid for licence to allow music bloggers to post streams of tracks.

Sean R said:Libya is small potatoes compared to Saudi Arabia. Wait till they see these kinds of protests/revolts. 20% of the world's oil reserves! Just imagine what that will do to gas prices.
The US severed all diplomatic relations with Libya in
1980, branding Col Gaddafi's government a sponsor of terrorism. Months
earlier, the US embassy in Tripoli was ransacked by people demonstrating
in support of the Iranian revolution.
The move capped a decade of steady deterioration in US-Libyan relations.
Since seizing power in 1970, Col Gadaffi had pursued Arab
nationalist policies. Resources were brought under state control and
alliances forged with nearby Arab nations.
Col Gaddafi also expelled US oil firms that had invested in the country and banned US military vessels from Libyan waters.
In 1981, two Libyan fighter aircraft were shot down by
the US over the Gulf of Sirte. Libya said US jets had violated its
airspace.
In 1986, the US tightened its economic sanctions against
Tripoli, freezing Libyan assets in US banks. A naval clash with US
forces in the Gulf of Sirte left 58 Libyans dead, according to Tripoli.
On 15 April 1986, US President Ronald Reagan ordered his
aircraft to bomb Tripoli, the town of Benghazi and bases used by the
Libyan military.
At least 100 people died in the attacks, many of them civilians - including Col Gaddafi's adopted daughter.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/4774355.stm
I still can't find what was the basic scenario of gulf of sidra clash in 80's
----------------
In 1973, Libya claimed the Gulf of Sidra to be within Libyan
territorial waters by drawing a straight line between a point near
Benghazi and the western headland of the gulf at Misratah This claim
was not generally accepted, although only the United States presented a
direct challenge by declaring that its ships would continue to regard
all areas beyond a distance of 12 nautical miles from the coast as
international waters. In response the President authorized Naval
exercises in the Gulf of Sidra to conduct Freedom of Navigation (FON)
operations. On several occasions, Libyan fighter planes harassed United
States planes from carriers maneuvering in the area.
When the United States Sixth Fleet began exercises in August
1981, Libyan fighter planes were assembled from elsewhere in the country
to fly patrols near the American ships. On August 19, two Su-22
fighter-bombers were intercepted by two F-14 Tomcat fighters from the
aircraft carrier Nimitz. While trying to escort the Libyans out of the
exercise area, one of the American planes was the target of an
air-to-air Atoll missile but was able to evade it. Both Libyan planes
were then shot down with Sidewinder missiles launched by the Tomcats.
The two Libyan pilots managed to eject and were rescued from the sea.
The ease with which the American planes disposed of their attackers
demonstrated that the earlier generation Su-22 and its Atoll missile
could not prevail against more sophisticated United States equipment.
Sean R said:We've kind of derailed this entire thread, but the chemical weapons were confirmed by UN and international inspectors, not the US.
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!