As the digital revolution has made the economies of scale in production and distribution redundant in the media, a new focus on people and quality is needed.
Probably mostly for @Squashed, but am curious to hear people's thoughts
Do we really think that Pitchfork has 'more sway' than NME? Bold statement. I agree that digital media has leveled the playing field somewhat but is a good/bad pitchfork review more powerful than a good/bad nme review?
I'm not sure amount of traffic directly correlates with level of influence. Surely NME has a weight of heritage that make their reviews have added credibility with the readers? Plus, I'm not sure how well known Pitchfork is with the average music buyer, I mean the chap that buys on Amazon and in HMV and goes to NME for the quick review.
Having said that I agree the NME seems to have passed up the opportunity to become a reasonable & valid voice in the indie music scene and instead is creaking with nostalgia, sycophancy and celeb gossip.
argh, the internet ate my previous post. It was manifesto of future internet music...hah... (joking, it was the usual long rambling)
so anyway
- I think the scale of major labels is still important. I am not sure about "economic of scale", some fundamental aspect of core music business, like recording/distribution, management, managing performance, etc..., but their ability to throw money at a)television, radio, established print outfit. b)corrupt politicians c)they still have the overwhelming manpower. marketing d) bargaining power against new internet companies/digital distribution. General thuggery, political racket and exploitative business practice.
- however if you look around, what they get for said expenditure is pathetic. Compare their recent output, what they released in the past few years. compare college radio chart vs. top 40, see what music on television... compare this to the crazy amount of music that flows on the net. the big labels have definitely lost cultural relevancy and influence among core music listener groups. (15-35)
- and finally, large organization is vulnerable to adverse economic situation... and we know how the last 5 major labels dropping dead one after another in relatively short period of time. Their economic size now is truly miniscule compared to larger internet media. Their traffic, their key web presence are not that impressive compared to scrappy new comers online.
- Technologically, they are beyond relevant. In fact they are the number one roadblock to new tools and business models. Obviously, this is the part where their so called "economic of scales" fails. It doesn't matter how much money or people they throw at a problem, people simply refuse to buy into their new devices and internet schemes. They couldn't sell a single file without going bankrupt 3 times over.
............
...soooo... we know all that. We've been observing this in the past 4-5 yrs. I think the blog has been doing a pretty good job in this area. We also can sense how these idiot will behave, continue to behave, what sort of stupid/corrupt/dirty plays they are going to pull. How all these are dragging good music at large, majority of musicians that we know create good music are not getting their dues, corrupting politics.... etc... etc
...but what to do to rectify this situation? There should be a systematic approach to completely eliminate big labels, convince larger public of the situation, and brought about next phase of mass music listening.
basically, time to start convincing the public to stop buying product. (directly advocating public to stop purchase of one or two key items... public campaign.)
give public all relevant facts, list of bad behaviors, point why certain item is a target, advocate change of consumer behavior ..... going straight where it hurt.
I think at this point, the blog know a whole lot about, techniques, target audience, alternative sound for each music category, how to present content, understanding public preference, large enough audience to affect larger public.... etc etc...
----- so yeah... probably it is time to actually check with direct action if big labels "economic of scales" really ends. Time to see if their size and influence can't save them from angry mob and dissatisfied public.
At the very arse end of this market I would still say that economies of scale are quite significant. Not in the way they once were, but they are for us.
You still can't really get away with not manufacturing physical products, it's as simple as that. And at the very low end of the scale, bumping up from hundreds to a couple of thousand to several thousand makes a colossal difference in terms of profit margins on manufacturing, especially if you splash out for something really nice.
Digital sales are basically just free money, but you still have to make something, and if you want it to be something nice, being able to make a lot rather than a few makes a big difference. Economies of scale are pretty irrelevant in the 5000-20000 bracket, but in the 250-500-1000-4000 kind of area it's massive.
True, but that piece was more about the media in general than specific to music. Also, whilst for music enthusiasts I completely agree you still need something physical - but I wonder how many physical sales there were on the latest JLS single for example? If your entire audience is under 18, how much of a hit would you take (ignoring the Xmas gift market) by going digital only for something like this? (I really don't know - I'm curious).
I believe you can genuinely do a purely digital magazine/website perfectly well without a print version that is expensive. Similarly, it is possible to do high quality video sessions or short movies (as you well know) with only products available on the commercial market at a reasonable cost.
My argument was more that by sewing up the entire supply chain from recording/creating to distribution, large media corporations were able to save money by getting so big that they could just squeeze out their smaller competitors (or buy them up) - no-one could compete as they owned a good section of the marketplace, not just the market. Now the marketplace is open again with the internet, and whilst there are savings to be had for being a certain size (physical production, payroll costs, etc), there is much less of a benefit to be utterly massive. If anything, huge scale now means slow to adapt, which means its a problem rather than a benefit.