With signs that the European Union
“may already be in recession” and the U.S. playing catch-up with the
labor market, exporting activity from industrialized countries will
expand just 2%.
The developing world will have a stronger 5.6% bump in trade.
Last year, U.S. exports swelled 7.2% but were still down from 15.4% growth the previous year.
Japan’s exporting didn’t grow at all – it declined 0.5% after rising 27.5% in 2010.
China, whose export activity soared 28.4% in 2010, hit the brakes and
decelerated down to 9.3% growth. Even India, the strongest performer in
2011 with 16.1% growth, still suffered a letdown from the year before.
Lamy cautioned governments against “economic nationalism” and the
“steady trickle of restrictive trade measures” that he said are already
undermining open borders.
“It is time to do no harm,” he said.
If the economic environment stabilizes – and oil prices don’t
continue their rapid run-up – the WTO predicts that trading will
improve, growing 5.6% in 2013. The U.S. will likely experience a
moderate recovery.
http://www.latimes.com/business/money/la-fi-mo-wto-global-trade-2012-20120412,0,1053045.story
I guess french will join the upcoming Iran war.
The IMF said baseline projections foresee a
decline in commodity prices during 2012-13. "Sizable downside risks to
global growth also pose risks of further downward adjustment in
commodity prices," it added.
Economic
data on Tuesday showed that China's imports of major commodities are
down. Still, data released so far shows that China's appetite for
commodities is likely to grow although at a slower pace as companies
stockpile. L3E8FA3AX
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/10/us-imf-commodities-idUSBRE8390Z820120410
Hilarious. RMB is going up, everything else will go up as well.
The increase to 1 percent from 0.5 percent takes effect
tomorrow, the People’s Bank of China said on its website
yesterday. This month, regulators raised quotas for foreigners
buying onshore stocks and bonds to $80 billion from $30 billion
and increased the amount of yuan held offshore that can be
invested locally.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-04-14/china-widens-yuan-band-to-1-percent-people-s-bank-says.html
non dollar money movement will become less and less predictable from dollar point of view. It will simply be larger.
This clown is going to be in a lot of pain soon. enhanced interrogation / worker reeducation type of pain. Probably seeking asylum soon. of course he is practically a useless c1 a asset now.



The Maastricht Treaty also assumed that
only the public sector is capable of producing unacceptable imbalances;
the market was expected to correct its own excesses. And the Maastricht
Treaty was supposed to have established adequate safeguards against
public sector imbalances. Consequently, when the European Central Bank started operated it treated government bonds as riskless assets that
banks
could hold without allocating any capital reserves against them. This
encouraged commercial banks to accumulate the bonds of the weaker
countries in order to earn a few extra basis points. This caused
interest rates to converge which, contrary to expectations, led to
divergences in economic performance. Germany, struggling with the
burdens of reunification, undertook structural reforms and
became
more competitive. Other countries enjoyed a housing boom that made them
less competitive. Yet others had to bail out their banks after the crash
of 2008. This created conditions that were far removed from those
prescribed by the Maastricht Treaty with totally unexpected
consequences. Government bonds which had been considered riskless turned
out to carry significant credit risks.
Unfortunately the European authorities
had little understanding of what hit them. They were prepared to deal
with fiscal problems but only Greece qualified as a fiscal crisis; the
rest of Europe suffered from a banking crisis and the divergence in
competitiveness also gave rise to a balance of payments crisis. The
authorities did not even understand the nature of the problem, let alone
see a solution. So they tried to buy time.
Usually that works. Financial panics
subside and the authorities realize a profit on their intervention. But
not this time because the financial problems were reinforced by a
process of political and social disintegration. While the European Union
was being created, the leadership was in the forefront of further
integration; but after the outbreak of the financial crisis the
authorities became wedded to
preserving the status quo. This has
forced all those who consider the status quo unsustainable or
intolerable into an anti-European posture. That is the political dynamic
that makes the disintegration of the European Union just as self-
reinforcing as its creation has been. At the onset of the crisis a
breakup of the euro was inconceivable: the assets and liabilities
denominated in a common currency were so intermingled that a breakup
would have led to an uncontrollable meltdown. But as the crisis
progressed the financial system has been progressively reoriented along
national lines. This trend gathered momentum in recent months. The LTRO
enabled Spanish and Italian banks to engage in a very profitable and low
risk arbitrage in the bonds of their own countries. And the
preferential treatment received by the ECB on its Greek bonds will
discourage other investors from holding sovereign debt. If this
continued for a few more years a break-up of the euro would become
possible without a meltdown – the omelet could be unscrambled – but it
would leave the central banks of the creditor countries with large
claims against the central banks of the debtor countries which would be
difficult to collect.
The Bundesbank has become aware of the
danger. It is now engaged in a campaign against the indefinite expansion
of the money supply and it has started taking measures to limit the
losses it would sustain in case of a breakup. This is creating a
self-fulfilling prophecy. Once the Bundesbank
starts guarding against a breakup everybody will have to do the same. Markets are beginning to reflect this.
http://www.businessinsider.com/george-soros-on-the-eurozone-crisis-2012-4
Unfortunately, euro has to keep printing to match Ben Bernanke speed, or else Euro zone industry will be destroyed. And ben bernak will keep printing in the next 2-3 yrs. That much is obvious.
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/04/15/division-on-cuba-ends-summit-of-americas-on-frosty-note/
This is much worst than I thought. No wonder they created that "hooker" diversion controversy to cover the summit failure. This after Asean failure and unproductive G8. Talking about Bush size failure.
--------------------
Washington’s southern neighbours, who are now showing unprecedented
independence from the United States on many levels, appear no longer
willing to take no for an answer.
This time around, the absence
of Cuba is on the front burner. To keep the image of harmony , even
conservative Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper is
reportedly willing to sign a final declaration - with reservations -
that includes two clauses calling for Cuba’s reincorporation into the
OAS, without prior conditions.
Washington, however, won’t sign,
arguing that Cuba is not a democracy and has no place at the table.
Because of this, at the time of this blog being written, there will be
no final declaration of the Sixth Summit of the Americas.
Obama
attempted to deflect attention from the thorny issue by blaming the
messenger - using an argument that he now probably regrets.
“Sometimes
I feel as if in some of these discussions, or at least the press
reports, we are in a time warp going back to the 1950s, with gunboat
diplomacy and Yankees and the Cold War. That’s not the world we live in
today,” said Obama, when asked about Cuba during an economic forum
preceding the presidential summit inauguration.
The reference to times changing and the Cold War soon backfired on the US President.
Opening
the summit , host President Juan Manuel Santos of Colombia not only
turned the tables on Obama, but he also made it clear there would
likely not be another Summit of the America’s if Washington does not
change its mind.
http://blogs.aljazeera.com/americas/2012/04/15/obama-casualty-cold-war
Latin America's
militant opposition to the decades-old U.S. isolation of
communist Cuba put more pressure on President Barack Obama at
the Americas Summit on Sunday and threatened to sink a final
declaration...
For the first time, conservative U.S-allied nations like
Colombia are throwing their weight behind the traditional demand
of leftist governments that Cuba be in the next meeting of the
Organization of American States (OAS).
Diplomats said the dispute could block the final declaration
planned for Sunday at the closing of the meeting, and originally
intended as a hemispheric show of unity."The isolation, the embargo, the indifference, looking the
other way, have been ineffective," summit host and Colombian
President Juan Manuel Santos said of the Cuba issue.
Bolivian President Evo Morales said earlier in the weekend that all
the Latin American countries wanted to invite Cuba but were stopped by
the U.S.
“It’s like a dictatorship,” said Morales, adding: “It is just
impossible for one country to oppose the will of others and not listen
to them.”
Argentine Foreign Minister Hector Timerman blamed both the U.S. and
Canada for using a “veto” to stop a consensus in favour of Cuba’s
participation.
Meanwhile, another issue — illicit drugs — captured the attention of the summit.
Harper said the leaders had a solid discussion on the issue.
“I think there is almost a universal agreement that we should
continue to fight transnational criminal networks. There is increasing
doubt about whether we are taking the best approach to doing that.”
--------------
The OAS was created as anti communism organization. whaddya expect. The same trick was tried in Asean few weeks back and he was not invited back.. The line was simple, lift Burma sanction or don't come.
afghan version of tet offensive. And this while the southern supply line is completely cut off. Meanwhile in north africa another regime change. So, I don;t know how they expect global recovery with so many instability.
Today's market action in USD (DXY Inverted - green), TSY yields
(red), S&P 500 futures (blue), and Gold (gold) broke into 5 specific
phases...
Phase 1 - markets were drifting until the release of the major US macro data (retail sales beat and empire manufacturing missed). The better-than-expected retail sales data spurred risk-on
and Treasuries were sold and Stocks bought as the USD was reflexively
sold (on correlations) and gold rallied (a little odd but looked like
modest high USD beta move). Consistent
Phase 2 - US markets opened and started to slide, only helped by a notable miss on NAHB and commentary - risk-off.
This Long USD, Short Stocks, Long Treasuries, Short Gold move all fit
as bad news is bad news (no longer good enough to prompt a pre-emptive
QE3 hope trade). The move was nicely in sync and these risk-off flows
petered out after the first hour or so of the day-session. Consistent
Phase 3 - From mid-morning to the European close, markets generally drifted sideways but the sniff of USD selling was apparent and picking up. Consistent
Phase 4 - From the close of Europe's equity markets to
shortly after their FX market closed (and notably market sweeps and
funding needs are comprehended), the USD was sold hard and aggressively.
The reflexive move of this forced USD selling / EUR
repatriation flow was to push risk-assets up (as correlation algos
reacted). The significant thing is that stocks moved on little volume
(algos not flow) and the selling in FX was heavy and rapid (we need
these EUR now). Inconsistent
Phase 5 - After the European markets had closed is when the
effect of the real asset selling and repatriation flows hits the US
markets. The need to bring EURs home in a hurry likely meant
European banks traded away their US stocks and US Treasuries but this
selling pressure was held back by the algos reacting to USD weakness. As
soon as the FX trades were done and the USD stabilized the buying
pressure disappeared at the margin and so Treasuries and equities sold
off as the marginal algo buyer had gone and all was left was the flow of
the EUR-based sellers left with dealers trying to unwind their
positions. Also note that there was no flow back to Gold or the USD
safety as USD-assets sold off (as they had already been shifted and were
now being reracked by dealers offloading). Inconsistent
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/eurocalypse-now-i-love-smell-repatriation-afternoon
Today, the Argentine government proceeded with that plan as a matter of
"public interest," sending shares of YPF plunging more than 11% in late
mid-day trading. As of 1:30 PM Eastern time, ARGT had yet to trade a
single share today. Soon after, 1,500 shares in ARGT changed hands,
sending the $3.5 million fund down 3.2% in the process.
Regarding the YPF nationalization, Spanish financial institutions hold a
large percentage of the company. Spanish fired back, stating that they
viewed the firm's interests as being in line with Spain's national
interests, Benzinga reported.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/time-to-cry-for-argentina-etf-argt-ypf-2012-04-16
There goes another european oil source. Good luck with that oil embargo europe. Next thing you know Russia decide not to sell oil anymore because they have enough useless currency.
Under the motto “Connecting the Americas: Partnering for Prosperity,”
33 heads of government met at the sixth Organization of American
States’ Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia. But the mantra at
last weekend’s OAS summit was an oxymoron. Instead, the summit merely
demonstrated the decreasing influence of the U.S. in Latin American
affairs. Not surprisingly, the sheer disagreement among its parties on
the issues of drug decriminalization and the reintegration of Cuba in
forthcoming summit led to the absence of any final declaration.
This hemispheric divide was already foretold when Cuba was ruled out
once again from attending, which in turn triggered Ecuador, Venezuela,
and Nicaragua’s reluctance to participate. Additionally, Bolivia and
Argentina suddenly departed early after complaining about the lack of
overall consensus and Washington's neutral position on Argentina’s claim
over the Falkland Islands. Even with President Barack Obama’s second
consecutive attendance, the Summit was a poor copycat of previous
meetings. Washington’s pressure to ostracize Cuba, the persistent lack
of consensus in approaching the security troubles of its neighbors led
to another failed opportunity for the U.S. The old hegemon of the
Western hemisphere who once toppled leaders and bullied governments will
face stiff competition when juggernauts like Brazil, as well as
multilateral entities like CELAC, UNASUR, and ALBA, demand more of the
region’s diplomatic pie.
http://www.worldpolicy.org/blog/2012/04/16/cartagena-romancing-undone
This is going to be bad for trade soon enough
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/17/us-sudan-southsudan-un-idUSBRE83G1BX20120417
Another Clinton era "let's steal those nigger's oil" gone totally haywire. I suppose, that's Argentina, South sudan are now off line. Saudi better start pumping hard before the big gulf war and gulf of mexico hurricane season come. It's going to be a very hot late spring
Overall, the predictions are not dire for 2012. The season is being
forecast to be relatively tame. Forecasters seem to agree mostly that
there is a probability of 12 named storms and out of the 12 named
storms, seven possibly will develop into hurricanes.
Out of the seven hurricanes, three of these are being predicted to be
"major" hurricanes in scope with winds sustaining 111 mph or more. This
would place them at a minimum at Category 3 status on the Saffir-Simpson scale.
Most the landfall models are predicting fairly close or normal
landfall of storms along the United States coastline. The Gulf of Mexico
coastline and the coastline of Florida are being given an elevated
chance of landfall over the East Coast in 2012.
When on calculates the "averages" for the Atlantic-Caribbean
hurricane season, we come up with the numbers that reflect 12.1 tropical
storms with 6.4 maturing into hurricanes annually.
http://dalehyde.hubpages.com/hub/Hurricane-Season-2012-Predictions-and-Names
Another $80Billion to go... can't they just raid Goldman sachs or something?
An incensed Spain
threatened swift economic retaliation against Argentina on Tuesday
after it unveiled plans to seize YPF, the South American nation's
biggest oil company which is controlled by Spanish energy group Repsol.
Madrid called in Argentina's
ambassador over the nationalization order on Monday by Argentina's
combative president, Cristina Fernandez, a move that sent Repsol shares
tumbling but delighted many ordinary Argentines.
"I must express my profound unease. It's a negative decision for everyone," Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy said.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/18/us-spain-argentina-ypf-eu-idUSBRE83G0QU20120418
oh yeah... let's go to war... Nice move Spain, how you gonna pay a trade war against Argentina backed by entire latam block? borrow more money from ECB? Watch Argentina pull the plug on Spain banks and repatriating all asset.
BERLIN (AP) -- Germany wants the International
Monetary Fund's lending capacity to be brought to some $1 trillion,
meaning adding another $400 billion to its coffers, a senior official in
Berlin said Tuesday.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity
in line with government policy, said bringing the IMF's war chest to a
"similar" level as the European financial firewall of 800 billion euros
($1.1 trillion) would send a strong signal to markets.
http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20120418p2g00m0bu087000c.html
Merkel is smoking crack. Either she backed changing the IMF voting proportion or make France agree on china status in return of direct injection. No free money.
Intel Corp. (INTC) and International
Business Machines Corp. (IBM), two of the computer industry’s biggest
bellwethers, posted the slowest sales growth in years as the
European slump weighed on orders last quarter.
IBM’s revenue climbed 0.3 percent to $24.7 billion in the
period, while Intel sales rose 0.5 percent to $12.9 billion.
That was the smallest increase for either company since the
third quarter of 2009, when the U.S. economy was just emerging
from recession. Even so, Intel predicted a pickup in sales for
the current quarter.
Let's have more oil war.
Yet another ugly day in financial markets: around the world stocks fell, the euro weakened, and commodity prices fell on fears that world growth will stall. The source of the problems was, again, Europe.
In the Netherlands, the center-right government of Mark Rutte fell,
unable to cobble together a coalition to pass budget cuts required by
EU fiscal rules – rules that mandate that eurozone countries run annual
deficits no more than 3% of GDP, which would force stringent austerity
upon the Dutch to bring down a deficit that is currently projected to be
4.6% of GDP in 2012. Rutte, along with Merkel of Germany, was a hardline advocate of the 3% fiscal discipline rules.
But
given that the sober Dutch are in no danger of defaulting on their
AAA-rated bonds, why the turmoil and panic? Because, perhaps, the Dutch
are indeed sober – and a significant number of them have said "enough".
Having seen the devastation inflicted on the Greek, Irish and Spanish
economies by tough austerity measures, many have concluded that the pain
is simply not worth it to meet an arbitrary 3% deficit rule.
That's point number two, though. Point number one is that I wouldn't trust those inflation figures in the first place.
The governments of Western Europe and the U.S. fudge inflation figures
as certainly as the Argentine government fudges them, just less overtly
and outrageously. They do that because they want to keep the perception
of inflation down; they don't want people panicking, which is a pity,
because the public should urgently do something to protect their
capital. They also don't want to see Social Security payments and other
payments that are tied to the consumer price index go up. They don't
have the tax revenues to pay for them and will have to print even more
money, which just exacerbates the problem. Official inflation numbers
are unreliable; only somebody very naïve—like a TV anchorperson—could
possibly believe them.
If you think of inflation as an increase in the money supply
above the increase in real wealth—which is actually what the word
means—the inflation rate is actually quite high at the moment.
Real wealth is being created at lower rates than it historically has
been, while the money supply is increasing tremendously. It's just a
question of when that inflation rate manifests itself on a retail level.
You've got to think like a real economist, not a political hack like
Joseph Stiglitz or Paul Krugman. You have to see not just the immediate
and direct consequences of something, but the indirect and delayed ones.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-post-how-speculate-your-way-success
Trust in anything official has degraded considerably. It doesn't jibe with reality on the street.
Inflation has been running fairly hot in developing markets for some
time. In regions like Asia, pressured to source food as growing
populations bump up against limits to available arable land, the amount
of capital devoted to food, shelter, and transportation remains high.
However, if we think of lower-earning populations across the globe as a
single class, there has been no protection from higher prices offered by
developed economies to their poorer populations. The bottom two
quintiles of US wage earners struggle with food and energy costs just as
much as their counterparts across the globe.
These structural changes in price levels, along with the increasing
inability of every population to endure them, have fallen into a
statistical gray area. Headline measures of inflation in OECD countries
churn out benign readings, while at the same time, poverty grows. But
this is a particular kind of poverty, a food and energy poverty, which
saps the power of consumers to spend disposable income on an array of
other items.
This emerging resource poverty is going to drive further changes in
price levels, and in particular it will restrain many forms of
consumption, including real estate prices. Cities will find, for
example, that with the price level of food rising and real estate prices
stagnant with rising transportation costs, urban farming is going to
advance very strongly. Note, for example, the resurgence in urban
farming in places like Brooklyn, NY, where large tracts of industrial
land have lain fallow for decades. Indeed, a classic pattern of 'hot'
inflation is that it quickly begins to drive out spending for
discretionary goods in favor of true basics, like food.
But there will be two important differences vis-à-vis
2008-2009. First, it will be happening with the US government far
deeper in debt than it was when the last recession began. In the
tightening phase, the government's interest expense will move above $1
trillion per year, and the budget deficit will jump to new record highs.
Second, it will be happening with the rate of price inflation already
at a troubling level. Another round of the monetary therapy the Fed
applied to cure the last recession would push price inflation to levels
beyond those reached in the 1970s. They'll do it anyway.
This
gets us to 2016 or 2017 with the system in turmoil but still
functioning. No wall yet, and there will be room for at least one more
cycle of reflation. But it will be a fast cycle, since in an
environment of already high inflation, people will be quick to spend
the newly created cash. That means a quick recovery from the 2017
recession and a catapult into the 20% plus range for price inflation.
Then the wall may be in sight.
http://www.financialsense.com/contributors/terry-coxon/how-long-before-america-hits-the-wall
The most "real" one will be when long term supplier contractor in the far east start demanding contract in non dollar denomination. From then, things will spiral out of control VERY quickly. (all those crappy currency swap, interest, etc. won't matter since those are all fantasy trade between banksters. Only lasting few micro second, fleeting bet.)
But if supplier start demanding non dollar, Walmart, HP, dell, GM/Ford, best buy...garment, consumer electronic ...APPLE! ....then we have supply chain disruption, contract cancelation, firing, factory clossing, etc..
The entire US retailers will die overnight, literally. none of these idiots are prepared or know what to do in the event of dollar overnight change..
China is expected
to begin trading in crude oil futures within the year, a senior
government official said on Wednesday, as the world's second-largest oil
consumer and crude buyer aims to increase its say in oil pricing.
"Within this year, China will
launch an international crude oil futures market, the third such market
in the world after the United States and the United Kingdom," state news
agency Xinhua quoted Guo Shuqing, chairman of the China Securities
Regulatory Commission, as saying.
He
said most of China's new demand for crude oil is now met by imports,
adding that Chinese imports accounted for 70 to 80 percent of newly
added global oil production.
Local
media said plans for crude oil future trading on the Shanghai Futures
Exchange have been completed and are awaiting the approval of Chinese
authorities.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/18/us-china-crude-futures-idUSBRE83H0CF20120418
Oil and taiwan will be big, then China dollar reserve really doesn't have big meaningful trade function anymore. It will mainly be financial weapon... probably stabilizing world trade if they feel nice. But all their vital trade is done directly in yuan.
Last year, ASEAN overtook Japan to become China's third-largest
trading partner, having $362.3 billion in trade with the country, up 24
percent from a year earlier.
China had $446.6 billion in trade with the United States in 2011 and $567.2 billion with the EU in the same year.
China's trade is increasing rapidly with emerging economies at a time that it is slowing down with developed countries.
Data from the Ministry of Commerce show that the value of trade
between China and the EU increased by 2.6 percent year-on-year in the
first quarter of 2012, and trade with Japan declined by 1.6 percent in
the same period. Trade between China and ASEAN increased by 9.2 percent
in the first quarter.
"China's trade with ASEAN will increase faster than with the US and
EU, and ASEAN is likely to become China's largest trading partner in the
coming years," said He Weiwen, co-director at the China-US-EU Study
Center at the China Association of International Trade.

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2012-04/20/content_15094898.htm
There goes dollar velocity
WASHINGTON (Kyodo) -- U.S. Trade Representative
Ron Kirk voiced hope Wednesday that Japan's interest in the
Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade talks remains unchanged despite
Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's decision to forgo a formal decision to
join the negotiations prior to his visit to Washington from April 29.
In an economic forum held in the U.S. capital,
Kirk said when then Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan announced Tokyo's
interest in the trans-Pacific free trade talks in fall of 2010, it
advanced the credibility of the framework.
"We certainly hope their interests will still be the same," the top U.S. trade official said.
Kirk also urged Japan to make a decision on its
formal entry into the TPP talks, saying it is "the surest path for Japan
to open up its economy."
http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20120419p2g00m0bu062000c.html
LOL... and they say this suppose to be signed by this week, 3 months ago.. coincide with feel good campaign season/green shoot/improving economy. (whatta bunch of clowns. total wishful thinking and fantasy.)
Nonetheless, it’s an important article, because Krugman is one of the
few thinkers who tries to grapple with a lot of the bigger picture
issues that I try to grapple with here:
What would the effect be if China decided to sell a chunk
of its Treasury bill holdings and put them in other currencies? The
answer is that China would, in effect, be engaging in quantitative easing on behalf of the Fed. The Chinese would be doing us a favor!
Krugman has it upside down: QE works (in theory) by decreasing the
amount of Treasury debt in circulation, forcing investors into
“riskier” assets. We have seen (quite predictably) that as the Fed
removes treasuries from the open market, bond prices have spiked to all-time highs.
http://azizonomics.com/2011/11/06/quantitative-diseasing/
.. The correct question is ...what happen if china put those "treasury" in hole soo deep, it won't see the light of day for next 10 years? (long term commodity, oil and mineral contract in non dollar region)
Or what happen if China put those dollar in economies that has almost no connection to dollar...
Those are the standard "kill dollar velocity, thus easing dollar inflationary effect.
or worst...what happen if those "dollar" is being used to purchase resources that US economy is competing for..
or.ultimately, just buy every single idiot politician in DC... with their money they can buy DC 20 times over.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/g-10-macro-data-plunges-worst-six-months-turns-negative
he White House announced it was getting into the commodities game
This shit is going to blow up spectacularly soon. just watch.. It'll make 2008 blow up looks like kiddie fountain spurt to a fire hydrant explosion.
Debt and net-equity in owner-occupied housing...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/here-what-other-financial-health-metrics-are-showing
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!