And the sole reason for me to get an iPad is finally gone.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/vpumy/audio_latency_finally_addressed_in_jelly_bean_the/

If we compare the Nexus 7 to a top-end Tegra 3 device like the 1.7GHz, 1920 x 1200 Transformer Pad Infinity
(set to its 'Performance' mode) the pre-production Nexus 7 more than
keeps up -- thanks in some part to its lower (1280 x 800) resolution.
The SunSpider score for web-browsing speed is especially healthy and
hammers home the point that this is in a different league to the Kindle Fire
-- which scores a poor 2,440ms in this test. Meanwhile, only the
GLBenchmark for GPU performance shows that the Nexus 7 may be slightly
held back compared to Tegra 3 supremos.
http://www.engadget.com/2012/06/28/nexus-7-early-benchmarks/
Just updated my GNex to a
rooted JB rom I found on XDA. I've just restored my apps using TB and
everything is running smoothly so far.
----------------------
New notifications is very rich now. Much more informative.
Camera app also has this new really cool feature: after taking
photos, you can see the animation flinging the taken photos to the
right, now if you swipe your finger from the right side to the left, you
can immediately preview your previous photos. Pinch to zoom out a
little bit and you can delete photos by flicking them up. Really neat.
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2406425,00.asp
gah ... defective journalism?
----------------
if July for Gnex isn't clear enough...then how about RIGHT NOW for GSM Gnex? (the rest will obviously depends on OEM and carrier, but Samsung SII/SII seems to be open enough to get it very early..one month. Probably before iOS 6 even out... which btw will looks very dated since 4.1 will be again updated to 4.1.x... (as usual)
and 3 months after iphone 5 launch the next generation Android will be ready to launch...(the next one willl probably have improved updating system to by pass the st00pids)
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/vqgll/anything_you_want_me_to_try_on_jelly_bean/
Just updated my GNex to a rooted JB rom I found on XDA. I've just restored my apps using TB and everything is running smoothly so far.
http://www.xda-developers.com/tag/samsung-galaxy-nexus/
Audio latency has always been an issue for Android, not a massive
deal breaker of an issue for the average user, but an issue none the
less—especially for those of us who use applications such as VoIP
clients or emulated instruments. For those unaware of the problem, audio
latency is the delay between an audio event being triggered and the
sound emerging from the speaker. For example, if you press a key on a
piano application and notice a delay between touching the screen and
hearing the sound, that’s latency.
The issue was actually brought up at I/O just over a year ago and the response was this;
“Latency is a big problem. We’re working at,
hopefully we hope to be able to do something about it with ICS. As we
investigated it it’s actually a pretty complex problem. There are a
number of different places where latency gets introduced. Most of the
latency is introduced below Android. Basically it’s happening in the
drivers or in the chipsets or somewhere in there, and some of these are
really obscene amounts like hundreds of milliseconds of latency in the
audio path. So, that’s something we’re going to push on. We started/ I
think we introduced something in CDD Gingerbread which was a “should”
hit certain latencies. But it’s a problem we want to deal with and
hopefully the next release will get it. Obviously it’s not going to
solve the problems for legacy devices but it’s going to get better.”
Well, unfortunately the next release didn’t get it. Android 4.0 still
suffers from this annoying flaw, and for some the problem seems to have
worsened. We can only assume that the problem lies beyond the reach of
the Android developers, or they simply had more important issues to
address. Perhaps somebody will ask the question again this year at I/O. Nudge nudge, wink wink…
http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/28/3124236/blackberry-10-delay-2013#
seriously RIM? By 2013, you'll be facing the first batch of A15 on 20nm. We are talking about second generation of speech recognition engines. Ultra high resolution screen + who knows what graphic accelerator... and of course Android 5.0. Samsung will introduce first non glass AMOLED with incell touch sensor. On the low end, a dual core GSM will hit sub $200.
what possible thing can RIMM introduce? You'll be in the same boat as Microsoft/Nokia. too little too late. nobody cares. High end price, but low end apps/OS feature. You are going against 1 billion androids instal base.
Google plans to release the source code for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean
in mid-July. But some people don’t want to wait that long to start
running the software on their phones and tablets.
Some folks have already ported the version of Jelly Bean running on the phones Google distributed to developers this week to run on additional handsets.
Other folks are taking the emulator image from the new Android 4.1 Software Developer Kit and using it as a foundation for firmware that can run on existing hardware.
For instance, xda-developers forum member randomblame has created an SDK port of Android 4.1 for the Acer Iconia Tab A500 tablet.
This is an Android tablet that was released in mid-2011. It has a
10.1 inch, 1280 x 800 pixel display, 1GB of RAM, and a 1 GHz NVIDA Tegra
2 dual core processor.
First, download the ROM here
Then follow DroidVicious’ instructions:
http://www.androidauthority.com/android-4-1-jellybean-review-video-galaxy-nexus-98371/



Yes, if rumors SemiAccurate hears are true, a whole flock of formerly
close Microsoft partners just decided that their new best friend is now
Google, Microsoft is no longer relevant to computing’s future. Most
were debating whether or not to bother with WART (Windows on Arm RT)
devices, and struggling to find a reason to do so. Then Microsoft just
unveiled one of the largest and most unethical industrial espionage
campaigns of the last few decades, so it is no surprise that everyone is
jumping ship.
If you haven’t been following the news, Microsoft handcuffed both ARM
chipmakers and OEMs with their brilliant two device per chipmaker
strategy. Then, they ‘worked closely’ with all the OEMs, ‘helping’ them
with their designs. As soon as those designs were essentially finalized,
Microsoft did their own device that paid homage to their OEMs most
innovative features. It is also a direct competitor to those OEMs, and
was designed knowing exactly where their weaknesses were.
To rub salt in to the wounds, Microsoft isn’t bound by the same
restrictions they imposed on the OEMs, that would make them have an…
err… actually quite unpalatable device. On top of doing what they
wouldn’t allow others to, Microsoft jacked the price of WART licenses up
with a questionably legal monopolistic bundle to about 3x what the same OEMs would pay for a full version of Windows 8 that does much more.
With Microsoft mandated awful designs and a $90 OS tax that Microsoft
doesn’t have to pay, that would be about 15% of the rumored $600 MSRP,
OEMs can’t hope to be competitive. So they are bailing, fast. The first
one SemiAccurate heard about from multiple sources is HP and their
Qualcomm based WART machines. Between this, the MS strong-arming of
Palm’s demise, and other things we can’t talk about, how long before HP
decides to make a real Linux push? Just kidding, that would take
competent management with a backbone, and it is HP we are talking about,
so no chance.
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/06/29/hp-said-to-dump-microsoft-over-surface/
warty is over before it even started. Nokia windows phone sales will implode at amazing rate after that last show. just watch.
The Google Nexus 7 hasn’t even begun shipping yet, and already we’re
speculating about the possibility of an upcoming big brother. According
to industry sources, Google is now preparing a 10-inch variant of its
new slate, which, as you may have guessed, will be called the Google
Nexus 10.
DigiTimes reports
that Google has already begun sourcing 10-inch touch panels from
Taiwanese manufacturers AU Optronics and Wintek. The partnership
reportedly makes Wintek Google’s largest touch panel supplier, with the
company having already shipped 500,000 7-inch units for the Nexus 7.
Although they claim the Nexus 10 is already in the pipeline,
unfortunately the insiders did not reveal when the device will arrive —
or what we can expect from it. Other than the promise of a 10-inch
display, there’s no indication of what Google might be packing into the
slate.
If the Nexus 7 is a Kindle Fire killer, then, it’s likely the Nexus
10 will be aiming to acquire some of the iPad’s market share.
--------------------
Better keep the momentum going...Windows of opportunity is VERY SMALL. we are talking about 6 to 8 months to reach 20-40 million devices. 20 million at holiday buying season! or else everything back to square one ...
We knew that Siri isn't very good. But this intense test shows just how ridiculous the gimmicky voice assistant could be.
The fact is that even Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak has been saying
this since the day Apple introduced the iPhone 4S with Siri. It just
sucks. Siri as an independent product, before Apple acquired it, the Woz told us at the Gizmodo Gallery:
http://gizmodo.com/5922332/google-search-beats-the-crap-out-of-siri-in-1600-question-testIt was really accurate, but now it's full of marketing-driven answers that are not correct.
Breaking down the type of errors Siri makes, Munster provides some sample questions that demonstrate how far it has to go:
Those responses would make a terrific TV ad. For Google.
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/06/29/minneapolis-street-test-google-gets-a-b-apples-siri-gets-a-d/
Google should mess with Siri's head just for comedy............ lol By now they should know what siri's request pattern is.
as SamIAm says, BB was champion of the corporate environment for a
LONG time, and rightfully so - their competition (WinMo/Palm) offered
some reasonable alternatives, but the complete integration with
Exchange, as well as advanced IT security controls for large-scale
deployments offered a much more robust product. this went on for a
decade or so, but RIM quickly realised that they couldn't live off
corporate paycheques forever and needed a consumer device. Cue the
Curve.
the 1st gen Curve (8300, i think - i got one when they were new) was
what brought large-scale consumer messaging to the forefront. while
everyone was still running up their texting bills, the Curve brought
consumers a viable alternative in a shiny package. "i send lots of
texts, so a hard QWERTY keyboard would be awesome! and, once my friends
get BB's too, we can just BBM and save money!" the Curve was likely (i
don't know detail here) their largest success in the consumer market,
but was quickly overshadowed by the emergence of the iPhone.
instead of offering a product to counter the growing touchscreen
userbase, RIM decided that it was just a fad - a decision that would
ultimately seal their fate. by focusing entirely on hard keyboards (BB
Storm excepted - that was the redheaded stepchild of touchscreens) while
everyone else was seeing diminishing returns on their hard key devices,
RIM began its fall from grace.
prior to the release of the iPhone3G, RIM left its product
development strategy untouched, and came out with the 1st gen Bold
(9000). while this was arguably their best device (i had one, and that
thing was a beast - dropped it 293874 times, only had minor scratches,
never had to do a battery pull or replace the trackball), the cost and
size meant it was primarily a business-oriented device (this was at a
time when manufacturers were shrinking their phones, not growing them).
this brought RIM even further out of the consumer market.
for the next little while, RIM would release phones with extremely
minor hardware upgrades.
while hardware development was stagnant, so was UI development. the
BBOS, when compared to iOS (or even Symbian - android was still in
development), was clunky and felt decidedly 20th century. RIM ultimately
ended up purchasing The Astonishing Tribe in efforts to bolster their
UX, but found out a little too late that despite TAT's foresight and
(arguably) revolutionary UX ideas, they couldn't put enough lipstick on
the pig that was BBOS, with the available hardware.
as RIM watched their profits dropping by double-digits each quarter,
the stubbornness of the leadership began to show its face again -
refusing to change the culture and direction of development, they
continued to offer consumers mild upgrades on previous devices with
virtually no OS upgrades. Android (more) and iOS (less) began rigorous
dev schedules which saw major changes to the UX, while BBOS was
essentially the same look and feel on their 2010 devices as it was on
their 2001 devices.
what they failed to comprehend is that these days, people thrive on
change. people no longer used their phones for typing messages and
making calls, there was MUCH more to the devices - which were
essentially tiny computers - that consumers were interested in
exploiting. iOS development saw mobile gaming EXPLODE in popularity.
mobile gaming is nothing new - back in the day, i knew a bunch of people
that bought nokias just to play Snake - but the advent of a touch
screen allowed for significant changes to the types of games. while the
market was shifting from texting and emails to gaming, RIM's obsession
with keeping its OS continued to drag it down further and further.
when rumours of RIM porting BBM to iOS and Android popped up, lots of
people thought this was a turning point and would bring RIM back into
the fold - however it was too little too late. who cares about BBM on
Android when almost everyone has iOS/Android already? not to mention the
respective markets were already flush with BBM-like apps, making this
possibility a moot one.
what about corporate? now, the majority of corporations have a BYOD
policy - bring your own device - which makes large-scale deployments of
BB's less and less relevant. if a corporation can cut their IT budget by
10's or even 100's of thousands of dollars, simply by allowing their
users to use the devices they want to use, does it really make sense to
keep paying for BES?
of course, that's just my two cents. they're Canadian cents, though, so they're worth as much as US.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/vs8yg/matias_duarte_says_rim_is_always_welcome_to/
Apple's motion alleged that the Nexus devices infringed four of its patents: US Patent Nos. 5,946,647 (actionable linking), 8,086,604 (multi-source searching), 8,046,721 (slide-to-unlock) and 8,074,172
(touch screen word suggestion). The official court ruling isn't
publicly available just yet, so we aren't exactly sure which of these
patents were found to be infringed. In order to obtain a preliminary
injunction, which is considered an extraordinary remedy in patent
litigation, Apple had to prove that the asserted patents were likely
infringed, likely valid, and that it would be irreparably harmed by
Samsung's sales of the product. We've seen in past cases that the
"irreparable harm" prong of this test has generally proven to be the
most difficult for Apple and other companies to adequately establish.
http://www.theverge.com/2012/6/29/3126934/apple-samsung-judge-denies-injunction-galaxy-nexus
Holy shit.things just escalate considerably... (what kind of shitty patents are those? I wonder if somebody has patented "touching screen on rounded corner panel" yet...)
Dogpile began operation in November 1996. The site was created and developed by Aaron Flin and later sold to Go2net (which was in turn acquired by Infospace).
The Dogpile search engine earned the J.D. Power and Associates award for best Residential Online Search Engine Service in both 2006[2] and 2007.[3]
Dogpile started a campaign in 2008 to use proceeds from site traffic to raise US$1 million for animals in need.[4]
In July 2010, Dogpile was ranked the 770th most popular website in
the U.S., and 2548th most popular in the world by Alexa. Quantcast
estimated 2.0 million unique U.S. visitors a month, and Compete
estimated 1,953,280.[5][6][7]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogpile
The present invention provides convenient access to items of information
that are related to various descriptors input by a user, by means of a
unitary interface which is capable of accessing information in a variety
of locations, through a number of different techniques. Using a plurality
of heuristic algorithms to operate upon information descriptors input by
the user, the present invention locates and displays candidate items of
information for selection and/or retrieval. Thus, the advantages of a
search engine can be exploited, while listing only relevant object
candidate items of information.
-------------
what kind of stupid patent is this? Did they just patent library's front desk? lol....Somebody should patent being a patent troll in silicone valley as business practice. I bet you can make tons of money licensing it to apple.
Google should start suing apple for every little trivial search techniques and mapping they have. I bet apple will go bankrupt and go back selling iPod again overnight.
good thing Apple is so hated by every tech giant and they are hanging by the thread on silicon fab. If TSMC doesn't feel like having them around. apple will be fucked.

Consider for instance: #5202828
A user interface element having a plurality of user interface
elements for marking, finding, organizing, and processing data within
documents stored in an associated computer system are described. Each
element typically has an appearance which is uniquely related to the
data or the function the element is designed to represent or perform,
respectively. In their simplest form, these elements are only used to
mark data within a document. Each element, however, can also be
programmed to cause the computer to perform some function in association
with the marked data, such as printing the data or mailing the data to
someone. A user can select particular data within a document using an
element and have that data associated with the element in memory. Data
marked with common elements can be found by searching for a particular
representative element in memory. Users can create their own elements,
program elements with their own desired functionality, and modify
existing elements. Elements can also be compounded together so as to
cause a combination of tasks to be performed by simply activating one
element.
Same thing, right? The PTO obviously didn't think so. Now, I could
write about 20 pages off the top of my head about this very problem and
precisely how messed up software patents are, but my point is more that
finding an old thing that does "something like" a current software
patent is pretty unrelated in terms of prior art, because just finding
similar or comparable functions is not enough.
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/vtlb4/so_who_wants_to_forward_the_sidekick1984_software/
I find this crap hilarious in sad way. most manufacturing and design for market implementation is done outside the jurisdiction. Most of actual handset companies are outside jurisdiction... the latest and newest proposed wireless are done by people outside jurisdiction...more importantly...THE MONEY is outside jurisdiction. FTC is some banana republics agency swinging its dick, but really irrelevant in global manufacturing chain.
It's like some agency in Nigeria screaming about its patent law and demanding the whole world obey. (or germany even. it's not that big of a market compared to say Thailand, India...Heck...Nigeria even)
Imagine the outrage if some Chinese FCC agency (which is the biggest smartphone market and producer) doing this FRAND crap gag. I mean if China and taiwan decide...fuck these people, let's ban anything and everything that has silicone and run on electron flow...There isn't going to be phone system in the US within few months. There is going to be literally NOBODY that can make smartphones domestically. NOBODY. Think about it. The system will be reduced to 90's technology overnight.
This is the reason everybody laugh when germany or france wireless agency trying to do funny thing. The world simply say...fuck off.
All these legal brawl are going to cost a whole lot in term of manufacturing actual consumer product. This is the biggest reason why manufacturing collapses in the US. (Compared to say, why japan or taiwan still make their own handset, despite having higher wage.)
And I hope apple be locked out permanently from next generation wireless period. (keep paying those lawyers apple.)
The EMS industry is commonly divided into Tiers by their revenue.
Tier 1 >$800m/1Billion - Foxconn/HonHai $50B (of the famed iPod city
scandal), Flextronics $35B Jabil, Benchmark Electronics, Sanmina-SCI...
Tier 2 $250/300m to $1B Tier 3 <$250m There is no hard rule on the
actual revenue designation at this time. Other categories have been
suggested by StepBeyond/EMSinsider: Tier 4 <10m and "Tier Mega"
referring to the Big 2, Foxconn and Flextronics.
Another distinction is drawn between EMS that specialize in High Mix
Low Volume (HMLV) and High Volume Low Mix (HVLM). Mix refers generally
to the complexity or different models of the pcb assembly. Volume refers
the number of units built, with products like consumer electronics on
the high end and prototype, medical electronics or machinery on the low
end. Typically, lower Tier EMS provide HMLV and higher Tier provide
HVLM.
Today the market is dominated by a handful of companies such as Hon Hai Precision Industries (Foxconn), Flextronics, Celestica, Sanmina-SCI, Jabil, Elcoteq, Onyx EMS, Benchmark Electronics, Vanguard EMS, Inc., Plexus, Mara Technologies, Kimball Electronics Group, ESCATEC, Electronic Systems Inc. in Sioux Falls SD, and a few dozen others, several thousand smaller companies continue to occupy EMS niches.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronics_manufacturing_services



http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/06/i-can-have-everything-googles-nexus-7-unboxed/
With the window to our personal data souls fully opened, the tablet told
us we had received a free $25 credit for the Google Play store (per the
offer on the product page, which Google says is only for a limited
time). The tablet also came preloaded with a selection of content in
various formats, including Swann's Way, issues of Popular Science and Esquire, and a Busta Rhymes song featuring Chris Brown (demographic target illustration complete).


I just got Netflix to run on my Nexus Q!
http://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/vvci1/i_just_got_netflix_to_run_on_my_nexus_q/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smartphone_patent_licensing_and_litigation
The smartphone patents licensing and litigations or smartphone war
is an on going business battle by smartphone major actors such as
Apple, Google, Samsung, Microsoft, Nokia, Motorola, Blackberry, using
patent litigations in order to secure or increase their market share
while slowing competitors' progress. Companies also use patents to make
opponents drops their charges, and so, are interested in purchasing
large set of smartphone patents to protect themselves. Recently[when?] the number of lawsuits, trade complaints, and countersuits and complaints based on patents and designs in the markets for Smartphones, and devices based on smartphone OSes such as Android and iOS, has been increasing significantly.
Timeline[1][2][3][4][5] (initial suits, countersuits, rulings, licence agreements, and other major events in italics):
Conductive films are used for the sensor electrodes of touch panels.
Normally, low- and high-refractive materials are accumulated on a base
film, and an ITO (indium tin oxide) conductive film is formed on top of
it. By stacking materials with different refraction indexes, the
reflection of external light, which deteriorates image quality, is
reduced.
However, its effect is limited. For example, when sensor electrodes are
formed by patterning ITO, the reflectance of external light is different
between an area where there are ITO sensor electrodes and an area where
there are no ITO sensor electrodes, generating a streaky surface. Also,
because the reflectance for the low wavelength region of visible light
is especially high, the screen becomes whitish.
To solve such a problem, the Sony Group developed the new conductive
film by using a sputtering method to form an ITO conductive film on a
low-reflection film with a moth-eye structure. The low-reflection film
with a moth-eye structure has minute, regularly-arranged concave and
convex structures on its surface.
The new film's reflectance of external light is almost uniform
regardless of the existence of ITO sensor electrodes. In addition, the
new film's reflectance of external light is less dependent on wavelength
than the reflectances of existing conductive films, and the reflectance
is equivalent to or less than those of existing conductive films.

http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20120620/224074/

[Matt] is the proud owner of a JGRO-based CNC router and he’s been
working on a way to control it without a computer. What he came up with
is a way to drive the CNC machine using this Android tablet.
A big part of the hack is the CNC controller that he’s using. The TinyG
is a board that can take commands via USB and convert them to
instructions for up to six axes. In the video after the break [Matt]
shows off a direct USB connection as the control method. This is the
most interesting part to us, but the system can also be run through the
network with the assistance of a computer feeding commands to the TinyG.
This second method means the Android controller would be wireless.

Over on the 68kmla forums, a website dedicated to old Macs built before 1994, [zydeco] released his Android port of Mini vMac, a Macintosh Plus emulator that puts the power of a Motorola MC68000 processor and System 7 on any computer.
![]()
http://www.theandroidsoul.com/latest-popular-trend-google-plus-is-boycottapple/
https://plus.google.com/u/0/s/#BoycottApple/posts


It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
I think RIM's lead worked against
them - it made them complacent. By the time they realised they couldn't
afford to be complacent, the rest of the world had noticed it some years
earlier.
Let's look at a rough timeline:
- RIM release the first Blackberry along with BES.
- Microsoft think "What a good idea". They integrate some of the more
basic features of BES into Exchange under the name of ActiveSync, and
improve it considerably as the years go by. Why does Microsoft do this?
Simple, it's a popular feature and they can use it to persuade companies
to upgrade their existing Exchange infrastructure rather than buy BES.
All they need to do is find some handset vendors to license the
client-side to.
- RIM doubtless looks into this, concludes that ActiveSync is nothing
like as sophisticated as BES (it isn't), and that nobody else has
released a handset that does a half-decent job of managing email anyway
(they haven't).
- Apple release the iPhone. It's a swishy piece of kit - far prettier
than anything RIM have ever produced, and much more pleasant to use -
but ultimately not terribly sophisticated. RIM ignore it.
- Microsoft release Exchange 2007. ActiveSync is greatly improved. RIM ignore it.
- HTC release the HTC Dream - one of the first Android handsets.
Android's prettier than Blackberry, and a sight easier to use. But RIM
ignore it.
- Apple license ActiveSync and include support in an update to the iPhone OS. RIM ignore it.
- Google license ActiveSync and include support in Android. Phones that support Android 2.0 or later get Exchange support.
- RIM buy QNX with a view to rewriting their OS. Corporate
acquisitions typically involve months of due diligence before they're
announced to the public; it's safe to assume that RIM were looking into
this some time before Android 2.0 was released.
So where does this
leave RIM? It's Q2 2010, they've obviously decided that long-term, they
want a new base for their smartphone OS. At this point they're probably
at least three years behind Apple and two years behind Android. Pretty
much all they can do is maintain their existing product line while
putting together what will be their next major OS upgrade and hope to
hell they can keep their heads above water for as long as it takes to
get something released. Will they? It's looking doubtful.
http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/12/06/29/0041241/does-rims-huge-loss-signal-wider-handset-market-deterioration