International, the Lumia 900, yes. The 800 is is a bit older. (both are the same, just different screen sizes and body)
But sales have dried up… anyone who wants one, has one… its still a good phone.
It still took them 4 months to release the product… and now that
people are starting to learn that WP7 is a dead platform (NO MORE NEW
APPS) – it becomes a why buy product? Remember, you are kind of stuck
with the phone for two years! No NEW apps, no more OS updates past
7.8. Its technology is out-dated. For $100, you can get a Motorola
Atrix HD with an HD screen, 1080p camera, dual-core, better battery life
and a future.
But by all means, the Lumia 800~900 phones are great looking, feel pretty good too.
The Lumia 8/900 are based off the Nokia N8 & N9… same shape and
materials. Its crazy that it took Nokia a YEAR to make them into WP7
phones… really?
epeat is just bunch of bureaucratic monkeys. They should be shot in public square instead of being taken seriously. they are utterly irrelevant to modern manufacturing process. (eg. how are one suppose to build ultra thin devices without resin and glue? It's too thin for screw.)
Somebody should create a completely fused electronic device, but with replaceable battery and extremely complicated mathematical model to its lifetime. And make it really cheap.
just to make them confuse.
-------------
Manufacturer declares percentage of postconsumer recycled plastic
content, measured as a percentage of total plastic (by weight) in each
product.
----
and apple is making their shitty laptop from insanely energy intensive aluminum.... lololol.... recycle those suckers. some 90 millions units annually. saving the environment my foot. It'll be fucking hilarious watching what those buffoons will do once all plastic OLED screen comes into production...
If they are serious about the environment, they should make it like "food ingredient" listing. (how many grams of each materials exists, most damaging one. And lifetime of whole product. That way consumer can decide for themselves how much damage a product causes. But then again, we still have to shoot those buffoons to eliminate unneeded bureaucratic layer.)
"Apple yesterday was granted Patent no. 8,223,134
for 'Portable electronic device, method, and graphical user interface
for displaying electronic lists and documents.' According to the
patent's description, the technology relies upon a touch-screen display and includes both the function for displaying lists and documents, and how they look on a mobile product."
----------------
Total WTF. more and more outrageous by day.
Adfonic’s Global AdMetrics Report is based on 4,000 rich-media
campaigns run monthly for brands like Samsung, Warner Bros, eBay,
McDonald’s, Groupon and Google, reaching 200 million mobile unique users
monthly over 80 billion ad requests. The company notes that today’s
Android popularity is a near-mirror switch from the quarter before, when
iOS took 45 percent of traffic to Android’s 38 percent. The only region
where Android has yet to dominate over iOS, Adfonic says, is South
America, and overall iOS lost marketshare in every region. The U.S., on
the other hand, has seen the most drastic flip:


The new version of Samsung’s LTE-friendly Galaxy S III — which is
expected to land in Korea on July 9 — sports both a quad-core Exynos
processor and support for LTE service from carriers SK Telecom, LG U+,
and KT. To round out the package, Samsung has also thrown in 2GB of RAM
to match the “future-proof”
U.S. model. The remainder of the new S III’s spec sheet is the same as
that of the original, so I won’t rehash those little details here.
http://techcrunch.com/2012/07/05/samsungs-new-galaxy-s-iii-combines-lte-and-quad-core-processor/
Raymond James’s Tavis McCourt this morning writes that Samsung Electronics‘s (005930KS) recently released “Galaxy S III” smartphone running Google‘s (GOOG) Android
operating system is getting “very positive feedback” at phone company
outlets that he’s called “across the country” in the last several days.
After making a number of calls over
the last few days to carrier stores following the arrival of the Samsung
Galaxy S III, we feel comfortable in saying that the Galaxy S3 launch
appears to be going relatively well. From our discussions with store
sales reps, demand for the Galaxy S III appears to be strong at all U.S.
carriers. In particular, Galaxy S III is benefiting from its LTE and
size advantage over the iPhone 4S, although we note Apple will likely
address both these issues with the iPhone 5 quite soon. On average, it
appears each store received roughly 10-20 phones in its initial shipment
and most stores sold out within 2-4 days. Stores are receiving supply
replenishments every few days but in smaller batches than launch day.
This is a similar pattern that we have seen for most flagship Android
devices historically. Supply and demand remain out of balance currently
as most follow- on shipments are sold almost immediately. At both
AT&T and Verizon, the nation’s two largest carriers, the Samsung
Galaxy III seems to be the top selling phone based on consensus replies
from store staff at this early stage of launch. In most cases the iPhone
remains the second best-selling phone in stores, but we suspect demand
has begun to taper off ahead of the iPhone 5 launch.
It's the most advanced mass produced model in the planet... whaddya expect? Apple model hasn't been updated meaningfully for 2-3 yrs...

The Finnish company, which is struggling with an extensive
restructuring, acknowledged that the three-month period, which also saw
sales plunge by 19 percent year on year, had been “a difficult quarter.”
ehrrr......... that does look like a total flop. Keep sucking Nokia's blood Microsoft. It won't last that much longer. No, windows 8 phones won't save anybody. It's already dead.
Qualcomm Inc. said Wednesday
(July 18) it expects supply of 28-nm chips to remain constrained until
the end of the calendar year, despite acknowledging that the firm is now
engaged with four foundries at that node.
Qualcomm executives said a tight supply of 28-nm capacity continues to drag on the company's
sales amid strong demand for 28-nm devices. The comments on the state
of 28-nm supply came following Qualcomm's fiscal third quarter financial
report, in which the company came up short of analysts' estimates for sales and profit. Qualcomm (San Diego) also trimmed the high end of its guidance for the fiscal year, which closes in September.
Steve Mollenkopf, Qualcomm's president and chief operating officer, said
Qualcomm expects the 28-nm capacity/demand gap to be alleviated by the
end of Qualcomm's first quarter of fiscal 2013, which closes in
December. "In the beginning of the [December] quarter we [will] still
have a gap that we need to deal with, but it [will improve] throughout
the quarter. We think it matches up toward the end."
http://www.eetimes.com/electronics-news/4390679/Qualcomm-sees-28-nm-capacity-crunch-through-2012
I want to know, how all those Apple fans think Apple going to make 7" tablet without using 40nm chip. (A5+ or A5)
So my situation, I'll be
as brief as possible...About a year ago I bought the original 7" Galaxy
Tab as a replacement for my laptop, as I mostly use it for browsing
reddit, light gaming, etc...and was relatively happy with it for a
while, but then over time, especially after I got a new phone with a
larger screen, the line between tablet and phone started to blur, and
while I still wanted a tablet, I wanted a larger screen, and a faster
processor, because with more than a few widgets running, the thing would
crawl, so I planned to upgrade to the Galaxy Tab 10.1. However, a
friend of mine was trying to get rid of his iPad and I figured what the
hell, I'll give it a shot, and he sold it to me dirt cheap. HUGE
mistake. I had it for about a month and hated it...a few nice apps that
aren't available for Android, but things force closed constantly, way
too many of the apps have to run in 2x zoom mode and look like total
shit, and overall the layout was restrictive and frankly, fucking
miserable to deal with for an Android fanboy. So I decided to sell it
and get a Nexus 7. I put it on craigslist, and before I could sell it
for cash, someone offered to trade me a Galaxy Tab 10.1 for the iPad, so
I went ahead and did that yesterday, and I love it, but I'm wondering
if I might be even happier with the N7 as I originally planned. My
problem is I've grown used to the large screen, as that clearly divides
tablet from phone. 4.3" to 7" may not be a big enough leap at this
point. I've heard talk of a Nexus 10 possibly this fall, in which case
that is my decision for sure, but it doesn't seem certain yet, and as
much as I like the Galaxy Tab, especially compared to an iPad, I feel
like it's a bit dated right now, and kind of had my heart set on the N7
because I've been fawning over it for weeks, I would much rather have a
pure Android device for a change, direct updates and support, no
bloatware, no carrier/manufacturer bullshit.
TL;DR - If anyone has had the Galaxy Tab 10.1 (or another 9-10"
GB/Honeycomb tablet) and has gone to the N7, how are you adjusting to
the size difference, and more importantly, is the speed/fluidity and
upgrade to JB incredible enough to make the size seem insignificant?
Size is my only holdout right now, but I think I could get over that if I
was in love with the functionality...also, any definite news I haven't
seen regarding the Nexus 10?
http://www.macworld.com/article/1167757/copying_content_to_android_devices_from_a_mac.html
http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/19/xperia-gx-goes-through-federal-inspection-is-still-the-sony-pho/

I, live many others, have been looking for solutions to expand storage
on the Nexus 7. Chainfire's StickMount works well with USB keys, so I
thought I would try it with something more oldschool:
Also seen running Keyboard,Mouse and USB flash drive through powered
hub. Ultima is being run through Dosbox straight from the floppy.
The frustration was most effectively articulated by Destructoid reviews editor Jim Sterling in his latest video rant,
which he posted a day before Ouya hit Kickstarter. To summarize,
Sterling thinks video game consoles – primarily the Xbox 360 and
PlayStation 3 – have become “crap PCs” that ultimately defeat their
entire purpose. Virtually every console game now requires multiple
log-ins, upfront installation, frequent downloadable updates and
complicated – and annoying – digital rights management that limits how
the game and its assorted content can be used. Whereas once upon a time a
person could pop a disc (or cartridge) into the machine and be off to
the races in seconds, now there’s a whole slew of hoops to jump through
before the action starts.
Lengthy installs and downloads were
always the downside of playing games on a PC, but the upside was usually
much better graphics. PC games are also often cheaper, if not free, to
play online and have more robust player communities, he argues.
http://www2.macleans.ca/2012/07/16/ouya-game-consoles/
------
Why can't they make game console like PC on steroid?
- Instead of trying to sell all in one expensive unit (xbox,ps3), why can't I buy motherboard/add on card every time there is new heavy duty game? (power supply, case, peripheral should remain the same, only motherboard/graphic card keep being sold as upgrade.... Instead of buying $299 instantly obsolete console every 3-4 years, while games are held back by old hardware. why not sell $99 motherboard/$99 graphic card every year?) Hardware is always fresh and powerful, driven by new hottest game...It can be garage size mainframe or a cheap handheld calculator...whatever consumer can afford. No new hot game, no new hardware sale.
- game should be downloadable only. CHEAP (99c for short game, $6 for medium $20 for bigger games) Skip the cost of retail, delivery, and packaging
- instead of forcing everybody buying uniform hardware, why not only test a player's rig just before entering online game for certification? (speed, responsiveness, no cheat, integrity of signal)...Player can use whatever rig he wants.
-game outfit makes money from running network, provide online services, keeping ecosystem working/maintain gaming protocol, and set gameplay standard. maybe selling original entertainment content...but they are not particularly in business to make money from selling hardware or franchise...
Essentially, it's new generation of console/PC hybrid, highly connected,
easily upgraded, open. Player can always buy the latest CPU/graphic
gears for sub $199, instal new OS, log in to his account...voila back to
the network.
Google has acquired third party email app for Mac and iOS devices
Sparrow for an undisclosed sum. The company’s staff will be integrated
into Google’s Gmail division.
The development heralds an interesting new future for Gmail in
terms of the kind of apps that could emerge to support the service.
http://www.siliconrepublic.com/new-media/item/28447-google-acquires-ios-and-mac/
So far: very positive.
Yes, the camera is front-facing only, and
there's a good reason there's not even a camera app on the thing by
default: it's pretty nasty. But does anybody really care? You'd look
like a complete dork trying to take photos with a tablet anyway. It's
probably fine enough for some video conferencing, but since that's not
my thing let's just say "whatever".
Software: I prefer the plain
android look, and dislike the various skins manufacturers have used (I
really don't understand the "pee in the snow" model of skinning android
to look and act horrible just so that the different manufacturers can
make their mark on it - I'm pretty sure the majority of people tend to
prefer plain android). So being a "Nexus" device I'm already fairly
happy with it.
And yes, it's smoother, and "plain android" is
picking up some of the best extensions (like app folder shortcuts). Yes,
resizable widgets etc. And a lot of small improvement just in general.
Verdict: it's solid. If you simply don't like tablets (or android), I
doubt the Nexus 7 will really change your mind, but if you were
borderline, the new price-point (for a quality device - there's been
cheap tablets before, but they've really been pretty bad) and the
incremental improvements might be enough to push people over the line.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/102150693225130002912/posts/Qj5WnLJXLXX
TSMC's earnings call yesterday was a mix of good short-term news and
uncertainty about the future. Company revenue grew 21% quarter-on
quarter, gross margin was up one percent, and 28nm yields improved
significantly as the foundry managed to wrangle the yield issues that've
been driving companies like AMD and Nvidia quietly bonkers. This last
point was confirmed in AMD's own conference call; CEO Rory Read
characterized 28nm GPU supply as "strong," in contrast to earlier
quarters.


7% ... So it's basically all qualcomm, nvidia, apple...with product as rare as hen's teeth..and apple doesn't even have a product in 28nm yet ..
EINDHOVEN, THE NETHERLANDS–(Marketwire -07/17/12)- A revolutionary
embedded algorithm in a new audio system from NXP Semiconductors N.V.
(NXPI) boosts the output power of micro speakers by over 5 times, vastly
improving the sound quality of mobile devices. By driving over 2.6
watts RMS into micro speakers that have previously been limited to 0.5
W, the NXP TFA9887 IC will give mobile phones, portable music players
and tablets much louder sound, deeper bass, and higher sound quality —
without risking speaker damage.
Not least, it looks like Apple is readying its own smaller iPad for
under $300. That could well steal the Nexus 7′s thunder–especially since
it almost certainly will do two or three things better than the Nexus
7.
But for the next few months, at least, Google has a bona fide hit on
its hands. And for all the right reasons, not just manufactured
scarcity.
lol. another big media idiot doing wishful thinking.
Nexus 7 represents the most advanced manufacturing processes and component that exists in the market. Apple is nowhere near the best player in the market. Apple CANNOT emulate this, not at this price point. not in 6-8 months. Apple has to stick with those overpriced aluminum cans.
- CPU. 45nm Tegra 3 is far more advanced than Apple's equivalent the A5X (size/yield/cost, performance, heat generated, power use). Apple has ZERO chance creating equivalent processor at 40-45nm. Apple is fighting on level playing field against the top CPU/GPU players. (Next generation leap frog you say. There is only so much 28nm capacity. what they gonna do for A7? fully fused CPU/GPU like huawei/nvidia? highly modified traditional GPU like Samsung/ARM in Mali? or maybe against top selling qualcomm/ATI/adreno crew?... Every single one of them already showing off their next gen wares all over the net. Where is apple? the best Apple can do is adding more powerVR cores..crappier version of TI OMAP5. .which makes their already bloated chip even bigger, more expensive and more power hungry. and get their ass sued to the moon copying other people's chip.)
- screen, manufacturing cost (yield), brightness, color saturation.. Hydis' N7 is one generation ahead of what Apple is using. Apple fan can talk about "retina" until they turn blue, but Sharp (current apple/LG current apple supplier) simply does not produce equivalent brightness/power use, despite it's ppi. So either they have to use the old panel technology (battery hoag/iPad 3 style) or wait until next generation ready for mass production. The idea that Apple can beat cost/performance of the usual player is pretty laughable. ..so keep paying those $599 iDevices people.. even a 7inch tablet.
- You can't beat Asus in motherboard design/manufacturing/cost control. Apple doesn't know mobo. This is like comparing Porsche/BMW vs. Chevy. (hence you got overheating, expensive and large mobo in iPad3) The chance of Apple able to fit A5X into a 7 inch device the size of Nexus 7.....IS ZERO.
-Last, Google will keep adding new OS feature. Even if Apple can magically come up with September/October mini iPad. Google will simply update Android 4.1 with 4.2 and quickly add little bell and whistles. All sort of little hacks and tweak that the internet build in 6 months will be ready for mainstream. (eg. even iOS 7.0 will be outdated... lol) Apple can't even do 'map/direction" properly nevermind voice command to find direction...(Siri will still be too dumb to do it 6 months from now) In the meantime as android 4.1 spreads wider Google can quickly improve audio model/adding more features on already stronger engine.
Maybe Apple can bribe the patent office again and get monopoly for "using electronic device while breathing using fingers"
-
The only thing Apple has going for them is Google flailing/bumbling on retail and marketing strategy... but this won't matter soon, since the rest of OEM crew will enter 4.1 tablet market by early next year. not to mention low cost chinese whitebox. But by then, the big battle is already won. Apple has to fight sub $100 Nexus 7 clones at the low end and A15 tablet on high end. Apple already lost on both front. zero chance coming up with dual/quad core A15 with next generation GPU. And sure as hell Apple isn't going to be able to manufacture sub $100 tablet.
Apple: overpriced aluminum cans.
b) No restrictions: iOS is a closed operating system but Android is
an open source that allows developers to customize it the way they want
to suit their needs. Android has no restrictions concerning
applications or content at all. With the iPad, there are applications
you cannot download because they are banned such as applications related
to WikiLeaks or applications banned in your country.
c) Better applications: The Nexus 7 Android Jelly Bean OS comes with a
ton of pre-installed applications including Gmail, Chrome browser and
other Google apps. These applications are convenient and beneficial.
iPads come with built-in apps which only existing Apple users will
benefit – it completely ignores any new comers who are not familiar with
Apple’s apps and services.
http://thedroidguy.com/2012/07/how-is-nexus-7-better-than-the-ipad/
Ikea is planning to make its next printed catalog
compatible with a smartphone application that will turn it into an
augmented reality experience. As pretty much the only retailer where
print catalogs are still incredibly important to the business, Ikea
prints and ships more than 210 million copies of its annual catalog
every year. That’s more than 20 times the population of Sweden, where
the company is headquartered.
http://www.slashgear.com/ikea-augmented-reality-catalog-becomes-reality-20239647/
It’s an amazing feat to behold when a company
makes a device so popular that it sells out in one store, much less the
entirety of the USA – but that’s what Google is doing with the Nexus 7.
This ASUS-manufactured tablet appears very much to be capturing the
imaginations – and pocketbooks – of users across the United States as
well as the UK as retailers both offline and online are showing sold out
signs galore. From what we understand it appears that 3rd party
retailers are “frantically” attempting to get more units in stock as
ASUS and Google make moves to make it all happen smoothly.

According to reports, Samsung’s earliest models, of the inflexible kind,
will be covered with a layer of glass that is 0.4mm thick. The panels,
compared to current generation panels, will be a thinner 0.6mm — in
contrast to the current measurement of 1.8mm thick , but with rigid
protective glass on top. Observers say that by manufacturing these
screens now, Samsung gains experience in producing them for traditional,
rigid devices such as phones and tablets. When OEMs will start thinking
about flexible gadgets, Samsung intends to be ready with ample supply.
http://phys.org/news/2012-07-samsung-readies-batch-super-thin-amoled.html
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Fluffy the Clown Jul 17, 2012 at 3:47 pm #